Literature DB >> 19329483

Genetic correlations among carcass cross-sectional fat area ratios, production traits, intramuscular fat, and serum leptin concentration in Duroc pigs.

K Suzuki1, K Inomata, K Katoh, H Kadowaki, T Shibata.   

Abstract

Animals accumulate fat in tissues as subcutaneous, intermuscular, intramuscular, and abdominal fat. Genetic interrelationships of respective fat depositions, however, have not been examined in depth. This study estimated genetic parameters for subcutaneous, intermuscular, and abdominal fat areas of 545 Duroc purebred pigs slaughtered at 105 kg of BW. Measurements were obtained using an image analysis system for positions between the 5th and the 6th thoracic vertebra (56TV), at half body length (HBL), and at the last thoracic vertebra (LTV) of the carcass. Moreover, serum leptin, which is a hormone product that is synthesized and predominantly expressed by adipocytes, was measured to determine if serum concentrations of leptin are useful as physiological predictors of fat accumulation in pigs. The heritability estimate of all fat area percentage at the HBL (0.70 +/- 0.03) was significantly greater than at the 56TV (0.53 +/- 0.03) or the LTV (0.55 +/- 0.04). Furthermore, the heritability estimate of subcutaneous fat areas at the HBL (0.71 +/- 0.04) was greater than at the 56TV (0.56 +/- 0.04) or LTV (0.60 +/- 0.03). Moreover, high heritabilities were estimated for ultrasound backfat thickness (BF; 0.72 +/- 0.03) on the left side at the position of HBL, intramuscular fat content of the loin (0.51 +/- 0.03), the seam fat score (SFS; 0.49 +/- 0.04), and the serum leptin concentration (0.62 +/- 0.05). Increased genetic correlations of BF with the fat area percentage of subcutaneous fat and all fat at 56TV (0.90 +/- 0.03 and 0.91 +/- 0.03), at HBL (0.88 +/- 0.03 and 0.94 +/- 0.01), and at LTV (0.88 +/- 0.03 and 0.90 +/- 0.02) were estimated. The genetic correlations of serum leptin concentration with the percentage of subcutaneous fat area and all fat areas at each position were also high (0.72 to 0.82 and 0.83 to 0.84, respectively). These results suggest that BF and leptin are good indicators of selection for decreasing fat deposition. Increased genetic correlation of the SFS with intermuscular fat area at 56TV (0.74) suggests that SFS is an effective indicator for decreasing intermuscular fat. The genetic correlation between the leptin concentration and feed conversion ratio was high (0.75 +/- 0.04). Results of this study indicate that the combination of BF and serum leptin concentration is a valuable indicator that can be incorporated into selection programs to improve carcass quality and feed efficiency in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19329483     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-0866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Intermuscular and intramuscular adipose tissues: Bad vs. good adipose tissues.

Authors:  Gary J Hausman; Urmila Basu; Min Du; Melinda Fernyhough-Culver; Michael V Dodson
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Integrating expression profiling and whole-genome association for dissection of fat traits in a porcine model.

Authors:  S Ponsuksili; E Murani; B Brand; M Schwerin; K Wimmers
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  NMR-based metabolomics highlights differences in plasma metabolites in pigs exhibiting diet-induced differences in adiposity.

Authors:  Maëva Jégou; Florence Gondret; Julie Lalande-Martin; Illa Tea; Elisabeth Baéza; Isabelle Louveau
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Neuronal genes for subcutaneous fat thickness in human and pig are identified by local genomic sequencing and combined SNP association study.

Authors:  Kyung-Tai Lee; Mi-Jeong Byun; Kyung-Soo Kang; Eung-Woo Park; Seung-Hwan Lee; Seoae Cho; Hyoyoung Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Taeheon Lee; Jong-Eun Park; Woncheoul Park; Donghyun Shin; Hong-Seog Park; Jin-Tae Jeon; Bong-Hwan Choi; Gul-Won Jang; Sang-Haeng Choi; Dae-Won Kim; Dajeong Lim; Hae-Suk Park; Mi-Rim Park; Jurg Ott; Lawrence B Schook; Tae-Hun Kim; Heebal Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Integration of transcriptome and whole genomic resequencing data to identify key genes affecting swine fat deposition.

Authors:  Kai Xing; Feng Zhu; Liwei Zhai; Huijie Liu; Yuan Wang; Zhijun Wang; Shaokang Chen; Zhuocheng Hou; Chuduan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding.

Authors:  Pieter W Knap; Antti Kause
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Effect of feed restriction and refeeding on performance and metabolism of European and Caribbean growing pigs in a tropical climate.

Authors:  Nausicaa Poullet; Jean-Christophe Bambou; Thomas Loyau; Christine Trefeu; Dalila Feuillet; David Beramice; Bruno Bocage; David Renaudeau; Jean-Luc Gourdine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Using Machine Learning to Identify Biomarkers Affecting Fat Deposition in Pigs by Integrating Multisource Transcriptome Information.

Authors:  Huatao Liu; Kai Xing; Yifan Jiang; Yibing Liu; Chuduan Wang; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.895

9.  The liver transcriptome of two full-sibling Songliao black pigs with extreme differences in backfat thickness.

Authors:  Kai Xing; Feng Zhu; Liwei Zhai; Huijie Liu; Zhijun Wang; Zhuocheng Hou; Chuduan Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-06

10.  Identification of Differentially Expressed MicroRNAs and Their Potential Target Genes in Adipose Tissue from Pigs with Highly Divergent Backfat Thickness.

Authors:  Kai Xing; Xitong Zhao; Yibing Liu; Fengxia Zhang; Zhen Tan; Xiaolong Qi; Xiangguo Wang; Hemin Ni; Yong Guo; Xihui Sheng; Chuduan Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.