Literature DB >> 19329333

Mid-term follow-up of the status of Gore-Tex graft after extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure.

Yoshie Ochiai1, Yutaka Imoto, Masato Sakamoto, Takashi Kajiwara, Akira Sese, Mamie Watanabe, Takuro Ohno, Kunitaka Joo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure (ECFP) using Gore-Tex graft has been performed with increasing frequency for the patients with functional single ventricle. However, lack of growth potential and longevity of the conduit are consistent concerns and main points of criticism of the ECFP. In this study, we investigated the mid-term status of the Gore-Tex graft used in the ECFP by comparing the internal diameter of the graft with the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter at 1 month and 5.2 years after the ECFP.
METHODS: Of 79 patients who underwent ECFP using Gore-Tex graft between November 1997 and December 2007, 33 patients who had completed cardiac catheterization at 1 month (21-73 days) and 5.2 years (3.3-9.6 years) after the ECFP were included in this study. We measured the internal diameter of the Gore-Tex graft and IVC at both catheterizations retrospectively.
RESULTS: The size of the Gore-Tex graft used in the ECFP was 16 mm in 17 patients, 18 mm in 9 patients, and 20mm in 7 patients. Laminar flow through the conduits was maintained without any stenosis or kinking of the graft in these 33 patients. No intervention or reoperation related to the extracardiac conduit has been required. There were no significant differences in mean cross-sectional area (CSA) of the conduits at 1 month versus 5.2 years after the ECFP for each conduit size, and no significant changes in the conduit-to-IVC CSA ratio (0.98+/-0.40 vs 0.82+/-0.21 for 16 mm, 1.09+/-0.30 vs 0.92+/-0.33 for 18 mm, and 1.16+/-0.55 vs 0.94+/-0.44 for 20mm conduit).
CONCLUSIONS: The conduit CSA and conduit-to-IVC CSA ratio remained unchanged in small caliber grafts down to 16 mm at 5.2 years after the ECFP. However, further investigation is necessary to evaluate the fate of the Gore-Tex graft and late hemodynamics in the patients with small conduits after they achieve full somatic growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19329333     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  10 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell sources for vascular tissue engineering and regeneration.

Authors:  Vivek K Bajpai; Stelios T Andreadis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure versus intra-atrial lateral tunnel Fontan procedure.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Katogi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-18

Review 3.  Evaluating the Longevity of the Fontan Pathway.

Authors:  John M Kelly; Gabriel J M Mirhaidari; Yu-Chun Chang; Toshiharu Shinoka; Christopher K Breuer; Andrew R Yates; Kan N Hor
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Fontan pathway growth: a quantitative evaluation of lateral tunnel and extracardiac cavopulmonary connections using serial cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Maria Restrepo; Lucia Mirabella; Elaine Tang; Christopher M Haggerty; Reza H Khiabani; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Anne Marie Valente; Doff B McElhinney; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Proximal and total humerus reconstruction with the use of an aortograft mesh.

Authors:  German A Marulanda; Eric Henderson; David Cheong; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation therapy after extracardiac conduit Fontan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Marrone; Gennaro Galasso; Raffaele Piccolo; Francesco de Leva; Rodolfo Paladini; Federico Piscione; Giuseppe Santoro
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Comparison of Fontan Surgical Options for Patients with Apicocaval Juxtaposition.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Camille Johnson; Phillip Trusty; Morgan Stephens; Wenjun Wu; Ritchie Sharon; Balaji Srimurugan; Brijesh P Kottayil; G S Sunil; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mahesh Kappanayil
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Statistical Shape Modeling for Cavopulmonary Assist Device Development: Variability of Vascular Graft Geometry and Implications for Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Jan L Bruse; Giuliano Giusti; Catriona Baker; Elena Cervi; Tain-Yen Hsia; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 0.582

9.  Case report of a Gore-Tex TCPC conduit dissection causing severe stenosis.

Authors:  Oliver Bates; Thomas Semple; Sylvia Krupickova; Carles Bautista-Rodriguez
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 10.  Transcatheter interventions in patients with a Fontan circulation: Current practice and future developments.

Authors:  Zakaria Jalal; Marc Gewillig; Younes Boudjemline; Patrice Guérin; Mara Pilati; Gianfranco Butera; Sophie Malekzadeh-Milani; Martina Avesani; Jean-Benoit Thambo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.569

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.