Literature DB >> 19329297

Screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with respect to anaerobic growth in non-detoxified lignocellulose hydrolysate.

João R M Almeida1, Kaisa Karhumaa, Oskar Bengtsson, Marie-F Gorwa-Grauslund.   

Abstract

A microplate screening method was used to assess anaerobic growth of 12 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in barley straw, spruce and wheat straw hydrolysate. The assay demonstrated significant differences in inhibitor tolerance among the strains. In addition, growth inhibition by the three hydrolysates differed so that wheat hydrolysate supported growth up to 70%, while barley hydrolysate only supported growth up to 50%, with dilute-acid spruce hydrolysate taking an intermediate position.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19329297     DOI： 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN： 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  8 in total

1.  Variable and dose-dependent response of Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts toward lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitors.

Authors:  Carlos E V F Soares; Jessica C Bergmann; João Ricardo Moreira de Almeida
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Isolation and characterization of a resident tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain from a spent sulfite liquor fermentation plant.

Authors:  Violeta Sànchez I Nogué; Maurizio Bettiga; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.298

3.  Re-assessment of YAP1 and MCR1 contributions to inhibitor tolerance in robust engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermenting undetoxified lignocellulosic hydrolysate.

Authors:  Valeria Wallace-Salinas; Lorenzo Signori; Ying-Ying Li; Magnus Ask; Maurizio Bettiga; Danilo Porro; Johan M Thevelein; Paola Branduardi; María R Foulquié-Moreno; Marie Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Screening of Non- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Tolerance to Formic Acid in Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Cyprian E Oshoma; Darren Greetham; Edward J Louis; Katherine A Smart; Trevor G Phister; Chris Powell; Chenyu Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Short-term adaptation improves the fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid at low pH.

Authors:  Violeta Sànchez i Nogué; Venkatachalam Narayanan; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Combining inhibitor tolerance and D-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production.

Authors:  Mekonnen M Demeke; Françoise Dumortier; Yingying Li; Tom Broeckx; María R Foulquié-Moreno; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Process intensification through microbial strain evolution: mixed glucose-xylose fermentation in wheat straw hydrolyzates by three generations of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Vera Novy; Stefan Krahulec; Manfred Wegleiter; Gerdt Müller; Karin Longus; Mario Klimacek; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Adaptation to low pH and lignocellulosic inhibitors resulting in ethanolic fermentation and growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Narayanan; Violeta Sànchez I Nogué; Ed W J van Niel; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.298
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.