| Literature DB >> 19329066 |
Weiwei Wang1, Qibin Luo, Haiyan Guo, Peter Bossier, Gilbert Van Stappen, Patrick Sorgeloos, Naihong Xin, Qishi Sun, Songnian Hu, Jun Yu.
Abstract
DNA barcoding is a powerful approach for characterizing species of organisms, especially those with almost identical morphological features, thereby helping to to establish phylogenetic relationships and reveal evolutionary histories. In this study, we chose a 648-bp segment of the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), as a standard barcode region to establish phylogenetic relationships among brine shrimp (Artemia) species from major habitats around the world and further focused on the biodiversity of Artemia species in China, especially in the Tibetan Plateau. Samples from five major salt lakes of the Tibetan Plateau located at altitudes over 4,000 m showed clear differences from other Artemia populations in China. We also observed two consistent amino acid changes, 153A/V and 183L/F, in the COI gene between the high and low altitude species in China. Moreover, indels in the COI sequence were identified in cyst and adult samples unique to the Co Qen population from the Tibetan Plateau, demonstrating the need for additional investigations of the mitochondrial genome among Tibetan Artemia populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19329066 PMCID: PMC5054130 DOI: 10.1016/S1672-0229(09)60003-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics ISSN: 1672-0229 Impact factor: 7.691
Fig. 1Phylogenetic trees built by NJ method (A) and MP method (B). The trees were constructed based on the COI sequence fragment showing phylogenetic relationships among Artemia species using Daphnia pulex as outgroup.
Ka/Ks analysis results among different Artemia populations
| Sequence | Ka | Ks | Ka/Ks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.00E-02 | 3.4873 | 0.0229 | |
| 1612 | 1.22E-02 | 0.9703 | 0.0126 |
| 1526 | 9.17E-03 | 1.0071 | 0.0091 |
| 1524 | 6.14E-03 | 1.1643 | 0.0053 |
| 1348 | 6.14E-03 | 1.1643 | 0.0053 |
| 1610 | 6.12E-03 | 1.2177 | 0.005 |
| 1609 | 6.15E-03 | 1.3616 | 0.0045 |
| 6.16E-03 | 1.386 | 0.0044 | |
| 1.28E-02 | 3.0613 | 0.0042 | |
| 1611 | 6.20E-03 | 1.703 | 0.0036 |
| 1188 | 6.08E-03 | 2.7791 | 0.0022 |
| 1317 | 5.48E-03 | 3.5289 | 0.0016 |
| 1321 | 2.93E-03 | 2.0111 | 0.0015 |
| 1256 | 2.94E-03 | 2.1369 | 0.0014 |
| 2.95E-03 | 2.2582 | 0.0013 | |
| 3.03E-03 | 2.5426 | 0.0012 | |
| 1588 | 7.12E-06 | 0.0071 | 0.001 |
| 1590 | 7.12E-06 | 0.0071 | 0.001 |
| 1592 | 7.12E-06 | 0.0071 | 0.001 |
| 1125 | 2.86E-05 | 0.0286 | 0.001 |
| 1233 | 2.86E-05 | 0.0286 | 0.001 |
| 1258 | 2.86E-05 | 0.0286 | 0.001 |
| 1261 | 2.86E-05 | 0.0286 | 0.001 |
| 1349 | 2.86E-05 | 0.0286 | 0.001 |
| 1520 | 2.89E-05 | 0.0289 | 0.001 |
| 1613 | 2.86E-05 | 0.0286 | 0.001 |
| 1580 | 1.43E-05 | 0.0143 | 0.001 |
| 1619 | 1.43E-05 | 0.0143 | 0.001 |
K2P distance showing the COI sequence divergence of six Tibetan populations
| ARC No. | Sample quantity | Min | Max | Mean | S.D. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1348 | 20 | 0 | 7.76% | 2.30% | 0.34% |
| 1524 | 18 | 0 | 1.31% | 0.51% | 0.17% |
| 1526 | 9 | 0.38% | 11.07% | 4.17% | 0.52% |
| 1609 | 20 | 0 | 4.92% | 2.49% | 0.45% |
| 1610 | 20 | 0 | 9.56% | 3.42% | 0.50% |
| 1612 | 8 | 2.55% | 12.01% | 7.07% | 0.79% |
Fig. 2Alignment of partial COI sequences including the indels among adult samples from the Co Qen population (ARC1526 and 1612). Initial analysis of DNA from adult samples revealed 2 single-nucleotide deletions, 2 three-nucleotide insertions, 27 single-nucleotide insertions, and 25 normal alleles (polyC with n=7) among 56 clones.
List of Artemia samples in this study with collection location and time
| ARC No. | Location | Harvesting year |
|---|---|---|
| 1125 | Tanggu, Tianjin, China | 1989 |
| 1188 | Yimeng, Inner Mongolia, China | 1991 |
| 1233 | Gangzhou, Hebei, China | 1991 |
| 1256 | La Pampa, Argentina | 1993 |
| 1258 | San Francisco Bay, California, USA | 1993 |
| 1261 | Luannan, Hebei, China | 1993 |
| 1317 | Bameng, Inner Mongolia, China | 1995 |
| 1321 | Argentina | 1996 |
| 1348 | Lagkor Co, Tibet, China | 1996 |
| 1349 | Vinh Chau, Vietnam | 1997 |
| 1520 | Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA | 2001 |
| 1524 | Jingyu Lake, Xinjiang, China | 2001 |
| 1526 | Co Qen, Tibet, China | 2001 |
| 1580 | Wudao, Shangdong, China | 2002 |
| 1588 | Beidaba, Shangdong, China | 2002 |
| 1590 | Huangnigou, Shangdong, China | 2002 |
| 1592 | Leguantai, Shangdong, China | 2002 |
| 1609 | Nima, Tibet, China | 1999 |
| 1610 | Yangnapengco, Tibet, China | 2002 |
| 1611 | Qixiang Lake, Tibet, China | 2002 |
| 1612 | Co Qen, Tibet, China | 2001 |
| 1613 | Luannan, Hebei, China | 1992 |
| 1619 | Chengkou, Shangdong, China | 1991 |
Hatching and survival rates of samples from Tibetan Plateau
| ARC No. | Hatching rate | Survival rate |
|---|---|---|
| 1348 | 29.72% | 74.29% |
| 1524 | 23.14% | 67.68% |
| 1526 | 19.00% | 62.50% |
| 1609 | 32.84% | 74.59% |
| 1610 | 28.72% | 67.58% |
| 1612 | 21.40% | 64.89% |