Literature DB >> 19329059

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude.

Dina H Erickson1, Denise Goodwin, Michael Rollins, Amber Belaustegui, Chad Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is essential in diagnosing and managing glaucoma. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is less dependent on corneal properties, such as thickness, elasticity, and rigidity, than Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). This study examined the relationship between GAT and DCT as well as their relationship with corneal properties and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA).
METHODS: GAT, DCT, OPA, pachymetry, refractive error, and corneal curvature measurements were obtained on 115 healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: Participants with thicker corneas (>or=580 microm) had higher IOP measurements with GAT than DCT (P = 0.005). Those with thinner corneas (<or=520 microm) had lower IOP with GAT versus DCT (P = 0.008). GAT and DCT readings did not differ significantly in corneas with average thickness (521 to 579 microm). A clinically significant IOP difference between DCT and GAT was found in 18.2% of subjects. A correlation was found between OPA and both refractive error and IOP (R(2) = .343, P < 0.0001). OPA was higher with increased IOP and decreased myopia.
CONCLUSION: DCT provides IOP measurements that are less dependent on corneal factors than GAT, aiding in diagnosis and treatment of patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Additional studies are necessary to examine the relationship between OPA, refractive error, and IOP and its possible association with increased incidence of glaucoma in myopic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19329059     DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2009.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optometry        ISSN: 1558-1527


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Which tonometry in eyes with keratoconus?

Authors:  H Altinkaynak; C Kocasarac; H Dundar; N Sayin; N Kara; E Bozkurt; N Duru
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Afshin Lotfi Sadigh; Rohollah F Fouladi; Hassan Hashemi; Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and degree of myopia in an adult myopic population aged 20 to 40 years in southeast Spain: determination and relationships.

Authors:  Manuel Garcia-Medina; Jose Javier Garcia-Medina; Pablo Garrido-Fernandez; Jose Galvan-Espinosa; Jesus Martin-Molina; Carlos Garcia-Maturana; Sergio Perez-Pardo; Maria Dolores Pinazo-Duran
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-28

5.  Macular Pigment Optical Density and Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Subjects with Different Axial Lengths and Refractive Errors.

Authors:  Maciej Czepita; Danuta Karczewicz; Krzysztof Safranow; Damian Czepita
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-06-13

6.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature.

Authors:  Konstantinos Andreanos; Chryssanthi Koutsandrea; Dimitris Papaconstantinou; Andreas Diagourtas; Andreas Kotoulas; Panagiotis Dimitrakas; Marilita M Moschos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-09

7.  Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yıldırım; Emre Tambova; Afsun Şahin
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-07-09

8.  [Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  Sebastian Bäurle; Anja Viestenz; Berthold Seitz; Arne Viestenz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 1.059

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.