Literature DB >> 19328675

Tool use and physical cognition in birds and mammals.

Nathan J Emery1, Nicola S Clayton.   

Abstract

In the wild, chimpanzees are the most prolific and proficient tool users, yet their understanding of tools in the laboratory is surprisingly poor. Although this apparent lack of understanding might be interpreted as a reflection of a general failure of animals to appreciate 'folk physics', recent studies suggest that some non-tool using species perform rather well on such laboratory tasks. In some animals, tool use and manufacture may also engage aspects of planning, but some non-tool using species have also been shown to demonstrate prospective cognition. Consequently, we argue that habitual tool use is not a clear predictor of physical intelligence, for either instrumental tool tasks or tests of planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19328675     DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  21 in total

1.  Social learning in New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Jennifer C Holzhaider; Gavin R Hunt; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind.

Authors:  Daniel Y-J Yang; Gabriela Rosenblau; Cara Keifer; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  'Captivity bias' in animal tool use and its implications for the evolution of hominin technology.

Authors:  Michael Haslam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Convergent evolution of complex cognition: Insights from the field of avian cognition into the study of self-awareness.

Authors:  Luigi Baciadonna; Francesca M Cornero; Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  More but not less uncertainty makes adult humans' tool selections more similar to those reported with crows.

Authors:  Francisco J Silva; Kathleen M Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities?

Authors:  Connor T Lambert; Gopika Balasubramanian; Andrés Camacho-Alpízar; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 7.  Elongation as a factor in artefacts of humans and other animals: an Acheulean example in comparative context.

Authors:  J A J Gowlett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Is primate tool use special? Chimpanzee and New Caledonian crow compared.

Authors:  W C McGrew
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  How do adult humans compare with New Caledonian crows in tool selectivity?

Authors:  Francisco J Silva; Kathleen M Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Rooks perceive support relations similar to six-month-old babies.

Authors:  Christopher D Bird; Nathan J Emery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.