PURPOSE: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNTs) are rare malignant neoplasms considered to be resistant to radiotherapy (RT), although data on efficacy are scarce. We reviewed our institutional experience to further delineate the role of RT for patients with PNTs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 2006, 36 patients with PNTs were treated with RT to 49 sites. Of these 36 patients, 23 had radiographic follow-up data, which were used to determine the tumor response rate and freedom from local progression. Long-term toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The overall response rate to RT was 39% (13% complete response, 26% partial response, 56% stable disease, and 4% progressive disease). A significant difference in the freedom from local progression between the groups receiving either greater than or less than the median 2 Gy/fraction biologically equivalent dose of 49.6 Gy was found, with all radiographic progression occurring in patients who had received <or=32 Gy. The actuarial 3-year local freedom from progression rate was 49%. Palliation was achieved in 90% of patients, with either improvement or resolution of symptoms after RT. Of 35 patients, 33 had metastatic disease at their referral for RT, and the median overall survival for this patient population was 2 years. Three long-term Grade 3 or greater toxicities were recorded. CONCLUSION: RT is an effective modality for achieving local control in patients with PNTs. RT produces high rates of symptomatic palliation and freedom from local progression. Prospective trials of radiotherapy for PNTs are warranted.
PURPOSE:Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNTs) are rare malignant neoplasms considered to be resistant to radiotherapy (RT), although data on efficacy are scarce. We reviewed our institutional experience to further delineate the role of RT for patients with PNTs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 2006, 36 patients with PNTs were treated with RT to 49 sites. Of these 36 patients, 23 had radiographic follow-up data, which were used to determine the tumor response rate and freedom from local progression. Long-term toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The overall response rate to RT was 39% (13% complete response, 26% partial response, 56% stable disease, and 4% progressive disease). A significant difference in the freedom from local progression between the groups receiving either greater than or less than the median 2 Gy/fraction biologically equivalent dose of 49.6 Gy was found, with all radiographic progression occurring in patients who had received <or=32 Gy. The actuarial 3-year local freedom from progression rate was 49%. Palliation was achieved in 90% of patients, with either improvement or resolution of symptoms after RT. Of 35 patients, 33 had metastatic disease at their referral for RT, and the median overall survival for this patient population was 2 years. Three long-term Grade 3 or greater toxicities were recorded. CONCLUSION: RT is an effective modality for achieving local control in patients with PNTs. RT produces high rates of symptomatic palliation and freedom from local progression. Prospective trials of radiotherapy for PNTs are warranted.
Authors: Kush Goyal; Douglas Einstein; Rafael A Ibarra; Min Yao; Charles Kunos; Rod Ellis; James Brindle; Deepjot Singh; Jeffrey Hardacre; Yuxia Zhang; Jeffrey Fabians; Gary Funkhouser; Mitchell Machtay; Juan R Sanabria Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Zina Meriden; Chanjuan Shi; Barish H Edil; Trevor Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Toby C Cornish; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Skye C Mayo; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Nik Bhagat; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Mark Shilkrut; Eli Sapir; Sheela Hanasoge; Matthew J Schipper; Daniel P Normolle; Edgar Ben-Josef; William Ensminger; Theodore S Lawrence; Mary Feng Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Yong Gyun Won; Kyung-Jin Seo; Jiyeon Hyeon; Ok Ran Shin; Eundeok Chang; Der Sheng Sun; Hae Sung Won; Yoon Ho Ko; Sae Jung Na; Su Lim Lee; Young Mi Ku; Dong Soo Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 1.817