Literature DB >> 19327421

Requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass surgery following percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era.

Probal Roy1, Axel de Labriolle, Nicholas Hanna, Laurent Bonello, Teruo Okabe, Tina L Pinto Slottow, Daniel H Steinberg, Rebecca Torguson, Kimberly Kaneshige, Zhenyi Xue, Lowell F Satler, Kenneth M Kent, William O Suddath, Augusto D Pichard, Joseph Lindsay, Ron Waksman.   

Abstract

Performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at centers without cardiothoracic surgery is a contentious issue. Although this practice allows greater access to care, there are safety concerns. The aim was to assess the requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after PCI and characterize patients at highest risk using independent predictors. The study population consisted of 21,957 unselected patients who underwent PCI from August 1994 (Food and Drug Administration stent approval) to January 2008 at a single medical center. Patients requiring emergent CABG (defined as within 24 hours of the index procedure) were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for independent correlates of emergent CABG. Emergent CABG was required in 90 patients (cumulative incidence 0.41%). Indications for CABG included triple-vessel disease, dissection, acute closure, perforation, and failure to cross. These patients had significantly higher in-hospital cardiac death rates (7.8% vs 0.7%; p <0.01) and higher rates of Q-wave myocardial infarction, neurologic events, and renal insufficiency. Independent correlates of emergent CABG after PCI were acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presentation, cardiogenic shock, triple-vessel disease, and type C lesion. Risk assessment based on these predictors identified 0.3% of the patient population to have a 9.3% cumulative incidence of emergent CABG. In conclusion, the need for emergent CABG after PCI in the stent era was low and was associated with poor in-hospital outcomes. Risk was nonuniform, with 0.3% of the study population, characterized by acute presentation and complex coronary disease, at heightened risk of emergent surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19327421     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Routine invasive versus conservative management strategies in acute coronary syndrome: time for a "hybrid" approach.

Authors:  Pravin Pratap; Sameer Gupta; Michael Berlowitz; Michael Berlowtiz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Indications and Outcomes from 2003 through 2013.

Authors:  Erin M Schumer; John H Chaney; Jaimin R Trivedi; Paul L Linsky; Matthew L Williams; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  Complications of coronary intervention: abrupt closure, dissection, perforation.

Authors:  Debabrata Dash
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-05-03

4.  Immediate rescue operations after failed diagnostic or therapeutic cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Sven M Almdahl; Terje Veel; Per Halvorsen; Stein E Rynning
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-10

5.  Predicting emergency coronary artery bypass graft following PCI: application of a computational model to refer patients to hospitals with and without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Zeeshan Syed; Mauro Moscucci; David Share; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Therapeutic hypothermia following emergent coronary artery bypass grafting after failed percutaneous coronary intervention in a comatose post-cardiac arrest patient.

Authors:  Seung Pill Choi; Jung Hee Wee; Jeong Ho Park; Kyu Nam Park; Sung Jin Hong; Sun Hee Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.