Literature DB >> 19327388

Anatomical origins of ocular dominance in mouse primary visual cortex.

J E Coleman1, K Law, M F Bear.   

Abstract

Ocular dominance (OD) plasticity is a classic paradigm for studying the effect of experience and deprivation on cortical development, and is manifested as shifts in the relative strength of binocular inputs to primary visual cortex (V1). The mouse has become an increasingly popular model for mechanistic studies of OD plasticity and, consequently, it is important that we understand how binocularity is constructed in this species. One puzzling feature of the mouse visual system is the gross disparity between the physiological strength of each eye in V1 and their anatomical representation in the projection from retina to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). While the contralateral-to-ipsilateral (C/I) ratio of visually evoked responses in binocular V1 is approximately 2:1, the ipsilateral retinal projection is weakly represented in terms of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) density where the C/I ratio is approximately 9:1. The structural basis for this relative amplification of ipsilateral eye responses between retina and V1 is not known. Here we employed neuroanatomical tracing and morphometric techniques to quantify the relative magnitude of each eye's input to and output from the binocular segment of dLGN. Our data are consistent with the previous suggestion that a point in space viewed by both eyes will activate 9 times as many RGCs in the contralateral retina as in the ipsilateral retina. Nonetheless, the volume of the dLGN binocular segment occupied by contralateral retinogeniculate inputs is only 2.4 times larger than the volume occupied by ipsilateral retinogeniculate inputs and recipient relay cells are evenly distributed among the input layers. The results from our morphometric analyses show that this reduction in input volume can be accounted for by a three-to-one convergence of contralateral eye RGC inputs to dLGN neurons. Together, our findings establish that the relative density of feed-forward dLGN inputs determines the C/I response ratio of mouse binocular V1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19327388      PMCID: PMC2735235          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  37 in total

1.  The determination of the projection of the visual field on to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat.

Authors:  P O BISHOP; W KOZAK; W R LEVICK; G J VAKKUR
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  How monocular deprivation shifts ocular dominance in visual cortex of young mice.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Frenkel; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Loss of binocular responses and reduced retinal convergence during the period of retinogeniculate axon segregation.

Authors:  Jokubas Ziburkus; William Guido
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Retinogeniculate connections: A balancing act between connection specificity and receptive field diversity.

Authors:  J-M Alonso; C-I Yeh; C Weng; C Stoelzel
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Functional consequences of neuronal divergence within the retinogeniculate pathway.

Authors:  Chun-I Yeh; Carl R Stoelzel; Chong Weng; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The projection of different retinal ganglion cell classes to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the hooded rat.

Authors:  P R Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Instructive effect of visual experience in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Frenkel; Nathaniel B Sawtell; Antonia Cinira M Diogo; Bongjune Yoon; Rachael L Neve; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The projection of the visual field onto the lateral geniculate nucleus of the ferret.

Authors:  K R Zahs; M P Stryker
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1985-11-08       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Structural and functional composition of the developing retinogeniculate pathway in the mouse.

Authors:  Lisa Jaubert-Miazza; Erick Green; Fu-Sun Lo; Kim Bui; Jeremy Mills; William Guido
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Magnitude of binocular vision controlled by islet-2 repression of a genetic program that specifies laterality of retinal axon pathfinding.

Authors:  Winnie Pak; Robert Hindges; Yoo-Shick Lim; Samuel L Pfaff; Dennis D M O'Leary
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  37 in total

1.  Obligatory role for the immediate early gene NARP in critical period plasticity.

Authors:  Yu Gu; Shiyong Huang; Michael C Chang; Paul Worley; Alfredo Kirkwood; Elizabeth M Quinlan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Amyloid-beta induced retrograde axonal degeneration in a mouse tauopathy model.

Authors:  Christopher Nishioka; Hsiao-Fang Liang; Barsam Barsamian; Shu-Wei Sun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Electrophysiological assessment of retinal ganglion cell function.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Transgenic mice expressing mutated Tyr437His human myocilin develop progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell electrical responsiveness and axonopathy with normal iop.

Authors:  Tsung-Han Chou; Stanislav Tomarev; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Neural cell adhesion molecule NrCAM regulates Semaphorin 3F-induced dendritic spine remodeling.

Authors:  Galina P Demyanenko; Vishwa Mohan; Xuying Zhang; Leann H Brennaman; Katherine E S Dharbal; Tracy S Tran; Paul B Manis; Patricia F Maness
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Glutamatergic synapses are structurally and biochemically complex because of multiple plasticity processes: long-term potentiation, long-term depression, short-term potentiation and scaling.

Authors:  John Lisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Loss of Arc renders the visual cortex impervious to the effects of sensory experience or deprivation.

Authors:  Cortina L McCurry; Jason D Shepherd; Daniela Tropea; Kuan H Wang; Mark F Bear; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Bidirectional ocular dominance plasticity of inhibitory networks: recent advances and unresolved questions.

Authors:  Gordon B Smith; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Rearrangement of retinogeniculate projection patterns after eye-specific segregation in mice.

Authors:  Itaru Hayakawa; Hiroshi Kawasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  How the mechanisms of long-term synaptic potentiation and depression serve experience-dependent plasticity in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Sam F Cooke; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.