Literature DB >> 19327372

Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems.

I-Chun Chou1, Eberhard O Voit.   

Abstract

The organization, regulation and dynamical responses of biological systems are in many cases too complex to allow intuitive predictions and require the support of mathematical modeling for quantitative assessments and a reliable understanding of system functioning. All steps of constructing mathematical models for biological systems are challenging, but arguably the most difficult task among them is the estimation of model parameters and the identification of the structure and regulation of the underlying biological networks. Recent advancements in modern high-throughput techniques have been allowing the generation of time series data that characterize the dynamics of genomic, proteomic, metabolic, and physiological responses and enable us, at least in principle, to tackle estimation and identification tasks using 'top-down' or 'inverse' approaches. While the rewards of a successful inverse estimation or identification are great, the process of extracting structural and regulatory information is technically difficult. The challenges can generally be categorized into four areas, namely, issues related to the data, the model, the mathematical structure of the system, and the optimization and support algorithms. Many recent articles have addressed inverse problems within the modeling framework of Biochemical Systems Theory (BST). BST was chosen for these tasks because of its unique structural flexibility and the fact that the structure and regulation of a biological system are mapped essentially one-to-one onto the parameters of the describing model. The proposed methods mainly focused on various optimization algorithms, but also on support techniques, including methods for circumventing the time consuming numerical integration of systems of differential equations, smoothing overly noisy data, estimating slopes of time series, reducing the complexity of the inference task, and constraining the parameter search space. Other methods targeted issues of data preprocessing, detection and amelioration of model redundancy, and model-free or model-based structure identification. The total number of proposed methods and their applications has by now exceeded one hundred, which makes it difficult for the newcomer, as well as the expert, to gain a comprehensive overview of available algorithmic options and limitations. To facilitate the entry into the field of inverse modeling within BST and related modeling areas, the article presented here reviews the field and proposes an operational 'work-flow' that guides the user through the estimation process, identifies possibly problematic steps, and suggests corresponding solutions based on the specific characteristics of the various available algorithms. The article concludes with a discussion of the present state of the art and with a description of open questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19327372      PMCID: PMC2693292          DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Biosci        ISSN: 0025-5564            Impact factor:   2.144


  152 in total

1.  Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation.

Authors:  Jörg Stelling; Steffen Klamt; Katja Bettenbrock; Stefan Schuster; Ernst Dieter Gilles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Network component analysis: reconstruction of regulatory signals in biological systems.

Authors:  James C Liao; Riccardo Boscolo; Young-Lyeol Yang; Linh My Tran; Chiara Sabatti; Vwani P Roychowdhury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolutionary optimization with data collocation for reverse engineering of biological networks.

Authors:  Kuan-Yao Tsai; Feng-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Reverse engineering genetic networks using evolutionary computation.

Authors:  Nasimul Noman; Hitoshi Iba
Journal:  Genome Inform       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Biological systems modeling and analysis: a biomolecular technique of the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Gautam Goel; I-Chun Chou; Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2006-09

6.  An intelligent two-stage evolutionary algorithm for dynamic pathway identification from gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Shinn-Ying Ho; Chih-Hung Hsieh; Fu-Chieh Yu; Hui-Ling Huang
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Inferring gene regulatory networks using differential evolution with local search heuristics.

Authors:  Nasimul Noman; Hitoshi Iba
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  System estimation from metabolic time-series data.

Authors:  Gautam Goel; I-Chun Chou; Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Estimation of metabolic pathway systems from different data sources.

Authors:  E O Voit; G Goel; I-C Chou; L L Fonseca
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.615

10.  Metabolic flux distributions in Corynebacterium glutamicum during growth and lysine overproduction.

Authors:  J J Vallino; G Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  98 in total

1.  An S-System Parameter Estimation Method (SPEM) for biological networks.

Authors:  Xinyi Yang; Jennifer E Dent; Christine Nardini
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  Subcellular metabolic organization in the context of dynamic energy budget and biochemical systems theories.

Authors:  S Vinga; A R Neves; H Santos; B W Brandt; S A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Automated refinement and inference of analytical models for metabolic networks.

Authors:  Michael D Schmidt; Ravishankar R Vallabhajosyula; Jerry W Jenkins; Jonathan E Hood; Abhishek S Soni; John P Wikswo; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Calibration of dynamic models of biological systems with KInfer.

Authors:  Paola Lecca; Alida Palmisano; Adaoha Ihekwaba; Corrado Priami
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Parameter estimation of kinetic models from metabolic profiles: two-phase dynamic decoupling method.

Authors:  Gengjie Jia; Gregory N Stephanopoulos; Rudiyanto Gunawan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Conserved and differential gene interactions in dynamical biological systems.

Authors:  Zhengyu Ouyang; Mingzhou Song; Robert Güth; Thomas J Ha; Matt Larouche; Dan Goldowitz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Global parameter estimation methods for stochastic biochemical systems.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar Poovathingal; Rudiyanto Gunawan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Gene expression model (in)validation by Fourier analysis.

Authors:  Tomasz Konopka; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-09-03

9.  Estimating parameters for generalized mass action models with connectivity information.

Authors:  Chih-Lung Ko; Eberhard O Voit; Feng-Sheng Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Identifying quantitative operation principles in metabolic pathways: a systematic method for searching feasible enzyme activity patterns leading to cellular adaptive responses.

Authors:  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez; Albert Sorribas
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.