Literature DB >> 19327311

Collection of annotated data in a clinical validation study for alarm algorithms in intensive care--a methodologic framework.

Sylvia Siebig1, Silvia Kuhls, Michael Imhoff, Julia Langgartner, Michael Reng, Jürgen Schölmerich, Ursula Gather, Christian E Wrede.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of physiologic parameters in critically ill patients is currently performed by threshold alarm systems with high sensitivity but low specificity. As a consequence, a multitude of alarms are generated, leading to an impaired clinical value of these alarms due to reduced alertness of the intensive care unit (ICU) staff. To evaluate a new alarm procedure, we currently generate a database of physiologic data and clinical alarm annotations.
METHODS: Data collection is taking place at a 12-bed medical ICU. Patients with monitoring of at least heart rate, invasive arterial blood pressure, and oxygen saturation are included in the study. Numerical physiologic data at 1-second intervals, monitor alarms, and alarm settings are extracted from the surveillance network. Bedside video recordings are performed with network surveillance cameras.
RESULTS: Based on the extracted data and the video recordings, alarms are clinically annotated by an experienced physician. The alarms are categorized according to their technical validity and clinical relevance by a taxonomy system that can be broadly applicable. Preliminary results showed that only 17% of the alarms were classified as relevant, and 44% were technically false. DISCUSSION: The presented system for collecting real-time bedside monitoring data in conjunction with video-assisted annotations of clinically relevant events is the first allowing the assessment of 24-hour periods and reduces the bias usually created by bedside observers in comparable studies. It constitutes the basis for the development and evaluation of "smart" alarm algorithms, which may help to reduce the number of alarms at the ICU, thereby improving patient safety. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19327311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  14 in total

1.  [Noise in intensive care units. Do the alarms for subspecialties differ].

Authors:  S Siebig; S Kuhls; U Gather; M Imhoff; T Müller; T Bein; B Trabold; S Bele; C E Wrede
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Using Bayesian networks and rule-based trending to predict patient status in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Cindy Crump; Sunil Saxena; Bruce Wilson; Patrick Farrell; Azhar Rafiq; Christine Tsien Silvers
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  Intelligent monitoring system for intensive care units.

Authors:  Kaouther Nouira; Abdelwahed Trabelsi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  A review of methods for the signal quality assessment to improve reliability of heart rate and blood pressures derived parameters.

Authors:  Nicolò Gambarotta; Federico Aletti; Giuseppe Baselli; Manuela Ferrario
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Real alerts and artifact classification in archived multi-signal vital sign monitoring data: implications for mining big data.

Authors:  Marilyn Hravnak; Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Eliezer Bose; Gilles Clermont; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Research: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Cost of Using Video to Evaluate Alarm Fatigue.

Authors:  Matt MacMurchy; Shannon Stemler; Mimi Zander; Christopher P Bonafide
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

7.  Adoption of ICU telemedicine in the United States.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Brandon D Cicero; David J Wallace; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  The proportion of clinically relevant alarms decreases as patient clinical severity decreases in intensive care units: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ryota Inokuchi; Hajime Sato; Yuko Nanjo; Masahiro Echigo; Aoi Tanaka; Takeshi Ishii; Takehiro Matsubara; Kent Doi; Masataka Gunshin; Takahiro Hiruma; Kensuke Nakamura; Kazuaki Shinohara; Yoichi Kitsuta; Susumu Nakajima; Mitsuo Umezu; Naoki Yahagi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Reducing false alarms of intensive care online-monitoring systems: an evaluation of two signal extraction algorithms.

Authors:  M Borowski; S Siebig; C Wrede; M Imhoff
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 10.  Patient monitoring alarms in the ICU and in the operating room.

Authors:  Felix Schmid; Matthias S Goepfert; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.