Literature DB >> 19327015

Characterization of canine embryonic stem cell lines derived from different niche microenvironments.

Jared T Wilcox1, Esther Semple, Cathy Gartley, Brigitte A Brisson, Steven D Perrault, Daniel A F Villagómez, Chandrakant Tayade, Sandy Becker, Robert Lanza, Dean H Betts.   

Abstract

Embryo-derived stem cells hold enormous potential for producing cell-based transplantation therapies, allowing high-throughput drug screening and delineating early embryonic development. However, potential clinical applications must first be tested for safety and efficacy in preclinical animal models. Due to physiological and genetic parity to humans, the domestic dog is widely used as a clinically relevant animal model for cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, orthopedic, and oncologic diseases. Therefore, we established numerous putative canine embryonic stem cell (cESC) lines by immunodissection of the inner cell mass (ICM), which we termed OVC.ID.1-23, and by explant outgrowths from whole canine blastocysts, named OVC.EX.1-16. All characterized lines were immunopositive for OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, SSEA-3, and SSEA-4; displayed high telomerase and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities; and were maintained in this state up to 37 passages ( approximately 160 days). Colonies from OVC.EX lines showed classic domed hESC-like morphology surrounded by a ring of fibroblast-like cells, whereas all OVC.ID lines exhibited a mixed cell colony of tightly packed cESCs surrounded by a GATA6+/CDX2- hypoblast-derived support layer. Spontaneous serum-only differentiation without feeder layers demonstrated a strong lineage selection associated with the colony niche type, and not the isolation method. Upon differentiation, cESC lines formed embryoid bodies (EB) comprised of cells representative of all germinal layers, and differentiated into cell types of each layer. Canine ESC lines such as these have the potential to identify differences between embryonic stem cell line derivations, and to develop or to test cell-based transplantation therapies in the dog before attempting human clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19327015     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2008.0336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  13 in total

1.  Equivalency of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryonic stem cells derived from fertilized, parthenogenetic, and hand-made cloned embryos.

Authors:  Musharifa Muzaffar; Naresh L Selokar; Karn P Singh; Mohammad Zandi; Manoj K Singh; Riaz A Shah; Manmohan S Chauhan; Suresh K Singla; Prabhat Palta; Radheysham Manik
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Derivation of buffalo embryonic stem-like cells from in vitro-produced blastocysts on homologous and heterologous feeder cells.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; T Anand; K P Singh; M K Singh; R A Shah; M S Chauhan; P Palta; S K Singla; R S Manik
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Preclinical derivation and imaging of autologously transplanted canine induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Andrew S Lee; Dan Xu; Jordan R Plews; Patricia K Nguyen; Divya Nag; Jennifer K Lyons; Leng Han; Shijun Hu; Feng Lan; Junwei Liu; Mei Huang; Kazim H Narsinh; Charles T Long; Patricia E de Almeida; Benjamin Levi; Nigel Kooreman; Charles Bangs; Cholawat Pacharinsak; Fumiaki Ikeno; Alan C Yeung; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Robert C Robbins; Michael T Longaker; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Growth requirements and chromosomal instability of induced pluripotent stem cells generated from adult canine fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sehwon Koh; Rachael Thomas; Shengdar Tsai; Steve Bischoff; Ji-Hey Lim; Matthew Breen; Natasha J Olby; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  Isolation, genetic manipulation, and transplantation of canine spermatogonial stem cells: progress toward transgenesis through the male germ-line.

Authors:  Michael A Harkey; Atsushi Asano; Mary Ellen Zoulas; Beverly Torok-Storb; Jennifer Nagashima; Alexander Travis
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  From "ES-like" cells to induced pluripotent stem cells: a historical perspective in domestic animals.

Authors:  Sehwon Koh; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Synaptically-competent neurons derived from canine embryonic stem cells by lineage selection with EGF and Noggin.

Authors:  Jared T Wilcox; Jonathan K Y Lai; Esther Semple; Brigitte A Brisson; Cathy Gartley; John N Armstrong; Dean H Betts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes.

Authors:  Aleksei G Menzorov; Natalia M Matveeva; Marios N Markakis; Venyamin S Fishman; Knud Christensen; Anna A Khabarova; Inna E Pristyazhnyuk; Elena A Kizilova; Susanna Cirera; Razvan Anistoroaei; Oleg L Serov
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Canine Pluripotent Stem Cells: Are They Ready for Clinical Applications?

Authors:  Dean H Betts; Ian C Tobias
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-10-07

10.  Safety and efficacy of the mesenchymal stem cell in feline eosinophilic keratitis treatment.

Authors:  Antonio J Villatoro; Silvia Claros; Viviana Fernández; Cristina Alcoholado; Fernando Fariñas; Antonio Moreno; José Becerra; José A Andrades
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.