Literature DB >> 19326982

A novel composite targeting method using high-field magnetic resonance imaging for subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Hiroki Toda1, Nobukatsu Sawamoto, Takashi Hanakawa, Hidemoto Saiki, Sadayuki Matsumoto, Ryosuke Okumura, Masatsune Ishikawa, Hidenao Fukuyama, Nobuo Hashimoto.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Accurate localization of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is important for proper placement of the electrodes in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for patients with advanced Parkinson disease. The authors evaluated the accuracy of our modified composite targeting method and the value of using high-field MR imaging for targeting the STN.
METHODS: Thirteen patients with advanced Parkinson disease underwent bilateral STN DBS based on 3-T MR imaging, and 13 patients underwent surgery based on 1.5-T MR imaging. By sequentially referring to the postmammillary commissure, the red nucleus, the mammillothalamic tract, and the STN, the modified composite targeting method determined the stereotactic coordinates for targeting the STN. The accuracy and efficacy of the composite targeting method and 3-T MR imaging were evaluated by using the intraoperative microelectrode recording, the postoperative imaging study, and the postoperative clinical improvement.
RESULTS: The landmark structures for targeting the STN were visualized clearly with 3-T MR imaging. The mean (+/- SD) path length through the STN of the central track was 4.9 +/- 1.1 mm in the 3-T group and 3.1 +/- 2.0 mm in the 1.5-T group (p < 0.001). Twenty-one (81%) of 26 electrodes were placed in the central track in the 3-T group, whereas 8 (31%) of 26 electrodes were placed in the central track in the 1.5-T group (p = 0.006). The rest of the electrodes were placed in the noncentral optimum track for alleviating parkinsonian motor symptoms. The mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part score during off period was reduced by 53% in the 3-T group and by 41% in the 1.5-T group (p = 0.14). The mean reductions of levodopa equivalent daily doses were 48.6% in the 3-T group and 43.7% in the 1.5-T group (p = 0.61).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the modified composite targeting method referring to the multiple landmarks with 3-T MR imaging offers reliable and clinically effective target for STN DBS surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19326982     DOI: 10.3171/2008.12.JNS0861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

Review 1.  Stereotactic implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes: a review of technical systems, methods and emerging tools.

Authors:  Simone Hemm; Karin Wårdell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Assessment of a method to determine deep brain stimulation targets using deterministic tractography in a navigation system.

Authors:  Josué M Avecillas-Chasin; Fernando Alonso-Frech; Olga Parras; Nayade Del Prado; Juan A Barcia
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Direct visualization of deep brain stimulation targets in Parkinson disease with the use of 7-tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zang-Hee Cho; Hoon-Ki Min; Se-Hong Oh; Jae-Yong Han; Chan-Woong Park; Je-Geun Chi; Young-Bo Kim; Sun Ha Paek; Andres M Lozano; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Visualisation of the zona incerta for deep brain stimulation at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  H U Kerl; L Gerigk; S Huck; M Al-Zghloul; C Groden; I S Nölte
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Fusing of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance and Intraoperative O-arm Images in Deep Brain Stimulation Enhance Intuitive Surgical Planning and Increase Accuracy of Lead Placement.

Authors:  Hideki Atsumi; Mitsunori Matsumae
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Deep Learning-Based Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Seong-Cheol Park; Joon Hyuk Cha; Seonhwa Lee; Wooyoung Jang; Chong Sik Lee; Jung Kyo Lee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Is there still need for microelectrode recording now the subthalamic nucleus can be well visualized with high field and ultrahigh MR imaging?

Authors:  Ersoy Kocabicak; Onur Alptekin; Linda Ackermans; Pieter Kubben; Mark Kuijf; Erkan Kurt; Rianne Esselink; Yasin Temel
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-11

8.  Brain connectivity markers for the identification of effective contacts in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Hai Lin; Peng Na; Doudou Zhang; Jiali Liu; Xiaodong Cai; Weiping Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.