Literature DB >> 19326669

Prevalence of fragrance sensitivity in the American population.

Stanley M Caress1, Anne C Steinemann.   

Abstract

This study determined the percentages of individuals who report adverse effects from exposure to fragranced products in the U.S. population and in subpopulations of those with asthma or chemical sensitivity. Data were collected through telephone interviews from two geographically weighted, random samples of the continental U.S. in two surveys during 2002-2003 and 2005-2006 (1,057 and 1,058 cases, respectively). Respondents were asked if they find being next to someone wearing a scented product irritating or appealing; if they have headaches, breathing difficulties, or other problems when exposed to air fresheners or deodorizers; and if they are irritated by the scent from laundry products, fabric softeners, or dryer sheets that are vented outside. Results aggregated from both surveys found that 30.5% of the general population reported scented products on others irritating, 19% reported adverse health effects from air fresheners, and 10.9% reported irritation by scented laundry products vented outside. This study reveals that a considerable percentage of the U.S. population reports adverse health effects or irritation from fragranced products, with higher percentages among those with asthma and chemical sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19326669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health        ISSN: 0022-0892            Impact factor:   1.179


  18 in total

1.  Artificial scents have no place in our hospitals.

Authors:  Ken Flegel; James G Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 4. Prevention of disease flares and use of adjunctive therapies and approaches.

Authors:  Robert Sidbury; Wynnis L Tom; James N Bergman; Kevin D Cooper; Robert A Silverman; Timothy G Berger; Sarah L Chamlin; David E Cohen; Kelly M Cordoro; Dawn M Davis; Steven R Feldman; Jon M Hanifin; Alfons Krol; David J Margolis; Amy S Paller; Kathryn Schwarzenberger; Eric L Simpson; Hywel C Williams; Craig A Elmets; Julie Block; Christopher G Harrod; Wendy Smith Begolka; Lawrence F Eichenfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Personal care product use among diverse women in California: Taking Stock Study.

Authors:  Robin E Dodson; Bethsaida Cardona; Ami R Zota; Janette Robinson Flint; Sandy Navarro; Bhavna Shamasunder
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Scented products emit a bouquet of VOCs.

Authors:  Carol Potera
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Fragranced products and VOCs.

Authors:  Madhuri Singal; Danielle Vitale; Ladd Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Dryer vents: an overlooked source of pollution?

Authors:  Rebecca Kessler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Determinants of exposure to fragranced product chemical mixtures in a sample of twins.

Authors:  Matthew O Gribble; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Mary A Fox
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Fragranced consumer products: exposures and effects from emissions.

Authors:  Anne Steinemann
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 9.  Scent in Motion: On the Multiple Uses of Ambient Scent in the Context of Passenger Transport.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-12

10.  Multiple chemical sensitivity and the workplace: current position and need for an occupational health surveillance protocol.

Authors:  A Martini; S Iavicoli; L Corso
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.