Literature DB >> 19326598

Effect of ascent protocol on acute mountain sickness and success at Muztagh Ata, 7546 m.

Konrad E Bloch1, Alexander J Turk, Marco Maggiorini, Thomas Hess, Tobias Merz, Martina M Bosch, Daniel Barthelmes, Urs Hefti, Jacqueline Pichler, Oliver Senn, Otto D Schoch.   

Abstract

Bloch, Konrad E., Alexander J. Turk, Marco Maggiorini, Thomas Hess, Tobias Merz, Martina M. Bosch, Daniel Barthelmes, Urs Hefti, Jacqueline Pichler, Oliver Senn, and Otto D. Schoch. Effect of ascent protocol on acute mountain sickness and success at Muztagh Ata, 7546 m. High Alt. Med. Biol. 10:25-32, 2009.-Data on acclimatization during expedition-style climbing to > 5000 m are scant. We evaluated the hypothesis that minor differences in ascent protocol influence acute mountain sickness (AMS) symptoms and mountaineering success in climbers to Muztagh Ata (7546 m), Western China. We performed a randomized, controlled trial during a high altitude medical research expedition to Muztagh Ata. Thirty-four healthy mountaineers (mean age 45 yr, 7 women) were randomized to follow one of two protocols, ascending within 15 or 19 days to the summit of Muztagh Ata at 7546 m, respectively. The main outcome measures, AMS symptom scores and the number of proceeding climbers, were assessed daily. Mean +/- SD AMS-C scores of 16 climbers randomized to slow ascent were 0.06 +/- 0.18, 0.26 +/- 0.08, 0.41 +/- 0.45, 0.53 +/- 0.77 at camps I (5533 m), II (6265 m), III (6865 m), and the summit (7546 m), respectively. Corresponding values in 18 climbers randomized to fast ascent were significantly higher: 0.17 +/- 0.23, 0.43 +/- 0.75, 0.49 +/- 0.36, and 0.69 +/- 0.54 (p < 0.008, vs. slow ascent in regression analysis accounting for weather-related protocol deviation). Climbers randomized to slow ascent were able to ascend according to the protocol without AMS for significantly more days than climbers randomized to fast ascent (p = 0.04, Kaplan-Meier analysis). More climbers randomized to slow ascent were successful in reaching the highest camp at 6865 m without AMS (odds ratio 9.5; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 89). In climbers ascending to very high altitudes, differences of a few days in acclimatization have a significant impact on symptom severity, the prevalence of AMS, and mountaineering success. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00603122.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19326598     DOI: 10.1089/ham.2008.1043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  High Alt Med Biol        ISSN: 1527-0297            Impact factor:   1.981


  17 in total

Review 1.  Special Considerations in Medical Screening for Participants in Remote Endurance Events.

Authors:  Jeremy Joslin; Martin D Hoffman; Ian Rogers; Robert M Worthing; Matt Ladbrook; Joshua Mularella
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Time-varying signal analysis to detect high-altitude periodic breathing in climbers ascending to extreme altitude.

Authors:  A Garde; B F Giraldo; R Jané; T D Latshang; A J Turk; T Hess; M M Bosch; D Barthelmes; T M Merz; J Pichler Hefti; O D Schoch; K E Bloch
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Acute high-altitude illness: a clinically orientated review.

Authors:  Tom Smedley; Michael Pw Grocott
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2013-05

4.  Medical services at ultra-endurance foot races in remote environments: medical issues and consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Martin D Hoffman; Andy Pasternak; Ian R Rogers; Morteza Khodaee; John C Hill; David A Townes; Bernd Volker Scheer; Brian J Krabak; Patrick Basset; Grant S Lipman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Altitude sickness.

Authors:  David Murdoch
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-03-18

Review 6.  Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 1. Commonly-used classes of drugs.

Authors:  Víctor H Nieto Estrada; Daniel Molano Franco; Roger David Medina; Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-27

7.  Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions.

Authors:  Daniel Molano Franco; Víctor H Nieto Estrada; Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-23

8.  High-altitude illnesses: physiology, risk factors, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Andrew T Taylor
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2011-01-31

9.  Delayed appearance of high altitude retinal hemorrhages.

Authors:  Daniel Barthelmes; Martina M Bosch; Tobias M Merz; Benno L Petrig; Frederic Truffer; Konrad E Bloch; Timothy A Holmes; Philippe Cattin; Urs Hefti; Miriam Sellner; Florian K P Sutter; Marco Maggiorini; Klara Landau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 2. Less commonly-used drugs.

Authors:  Alejandro Gonzalez Garay; Daniel Molano Franco; Víctor H Nieto Estrada; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.