| Literature DB >> 19325740 |
Peter J Edmonson1, William D Hunt2, Desmond D Stubbs3, Sang-Hun Lee4.
Abstract
Acoustic wave biosensors are a real-time, label-free biosensor technology, which have been exploited for the detection of proteins and cells. One of the conventional biosensor approaches involves the immobilization of a monolayer of antibodies onto the surface of the acoustic wave device for the detection of a specific analyte. The method described within includes at least two immobilizations of two different antibodies onto the surfaces of two separate acoustic wave devices for the detection of several analogous analytes. The chemical specificity of the molecular recognition event is achieved by virtue of the extremely high (nM to pM) binding affinity between the antibody and its antigen. In a standard ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) test, there are multiple steps and the end result is a measure of what is bound so tightly that it does not wash away easily. The fact that this "gold standard" is very much not real time, masks the dance that is the molecular recognition event. X-Ray Crystallographer, Ian Wilson, demonstrated more than a decade ago that antibodies undergo conformational change during a binding event[1, 2]. Further, it is known in the arena of immunochemistry that some antibodies exhibit significant cross-reactivity and this is widely termed antibody promiscuity. A third piece of the puzzle that we will exploit in our system of acoustic wave biosensors is the notion of chemical orthogonality. These three biochemical constructs, the dance, antibody promiscuity and chemical orthogonality will be combined in this paper with the notions of in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) signals from digital radio to manifest an approach to molecular recognition that allows a level of discrimination and analysis unobtainable without the aggregate. As an example we present experimental data on the detection of TNT, RDX, C4, ammonium nitrate and musk oil from a system of antibody-coated acoustic wave sensors.Entities:
Keywords: acoustic wave biosensors; antibody promiscuity; biosensors; chemical orthogonality; conformational change; digital radio
Year: 2008 PMID: 19325740 PMCID: PMC2635662 DOI: 10.3390/ijms9020154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1.Schematic of a SAW immunosensor
Figure 2.A schematic of 2-channel (A), and n-channel (B) biosensor system
Figure 3.(A) Conversion from time-frequency domain to the quadrature phase domain. (B) 8-ary QAM constellation diagram. (C) two channel immunosensor signal state-space map
Comparison table between digital radio systems and semi-orthogonal state-space immunosensing.
| Parameters | Digital Radio Systems | Semi-orthogonal state-space immunosensing |
|---|---|---|
| Group showing the relationship between binary data and the signals magnitude and phase | Group showing the relationship between analyte data and the signals frequency | |
| Two orthogonal signal channels with embedded phase and magnitude information dependent on binary data | Two orthogonal or semi- orthogonal signal channels with embedded frequency information dependent on analyte data | |
| Degree of similarity between the binary coded signals | Degree of chemical similarity between analytes | |
| Dependent upon binary data characteristics such as bit value | Dependent upon analyte characteristics such as concentration and/or vapor pressure | |
| Dependent of front-end and baseband filtering to reject close-in signals | Dependent on the antibodies inherent ability to distinguish antigenic differences to reject similar analytes | |
| Ability of the system to respond to weak RF signals (measured in microvolts) | Ability of the system to respond to low concentrations (measured in parts per billion) | |
| Semi-orthogonality of pairwise signals and/or cross channel rejection characteristics | Immunoglobulin multispecificity of antibodies to analytes | |
| Receiver's energy per bit to the noise power spectral density ratio, Eb/No, dependent on data rate, transmit power, and path loss | Sensor's bound antigen concentration ( |
Figure 4.Explosive substances and analogues used for the experiments (A), and the signal state-space map of explosive samples (B).
Figure 5.A three dimensional signal state-space map generated from the signature of three channel semi-orthogonal immunosensors system. Each individual sensor is coated with anti-TNT, anti-RDX, and anti-DNP antibodies respectively. The headspace vapor of various soil samples containing TNT and nitrophenol analogues were analyzed.