| Literature DB >> 19325516 |
Luana Maggi1, Manuel Carmona, Amaya Zalacain, Magdalena Martínez Tomé, María Antonia Murcia, Gonzalo Luis Alonso.
Abstract
The effect of parabens on the shelf-life of crocetin esters and picrocrocin in aqueous saffron solutions was studied. Degradation of saffron crocetin esters fits a first-order kinetics model, and the results indicated that the crocetin (beta-D-glucosyl)-(beta-D-gentiobiosyl) esters were more stable than the crocetin di-(beta-D-gentiobiosyl) esters regardless of whether trans and cis isomers were considered. Under all tested conditions both parabens gave good results, especially propyl paraben that showed a greater influence on the degradation rate constant, except for cis-crocetin di-(beta-D-gentiobiosyl) ester and cis-crocetin (beta-D-glucosyl)-(beta-D-gentiobiosyl) ester. In presence of propyl paraben (200 mg/L), the half-life periods of trans-crocetin di-(beta-D-gentiobiosyl) esterimproved considerably, up to four-fold. Special attention has been paid to the effect of propyl paraben on 46 saffrons with different crocetin ester contents. No differences were observed in terms of picrocrocin. By analysis of variance, it is noteworthy that there were differences between the mean content of crocetin esters for all analysed saffron, except for trans-crocetin (beta-D-glucosyl)-(beta-D-gentiobiosyl) ester.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19325516 PMCID: PMC6253934 DOI: 10.3390/molecules14031160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total and individual crocetin esters composition, retention time (tR), rate constants (k), determination coefficients (R2) and half-life periods (t1/2) of each crocetin ester in saffron aqueous extract of the control sample.
| Compound | Mean contentab±SD (g/100g) | % contenta ± SD | tR (min) | ( | R2 | t1/2 (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total crocetin esters | 31.15±0.05 | 100.00±0.01 | 14.6 | 0.995 | 47 | |
| Total
| 28.21±0.08 | 93.09±0.22 | 13.7 | 0.995 | 51 | |
| Total
| 2.94±0.17 | 6.91±0.32 | 17.7 | 0.946 | 39 | |
| Trans-4-GG | 18.72±0.38 | 58.61±1.19 | 10.3 | 29.3 | 0.998 | 24 |
| Trans-3-Gg | 6.75±0.39 | 25.34±1.45 | 10.8 | 11.9 | 0.912 | 58 |
| Trans-2–G | 0.87±0.12 | 4.08±0.56 | 11.5 | 41.8 | 0.972 | 17 |
| Cis-4-GG | 1.97±0.32 | 4.39±0.71 | 12.0 | 18.8 | 0.991 | 37 |
| Cis-3-Gg | 0.82±0.10 | 2.20±0.28 | 12.7 | 11.4 | 0.974 | 61 |
a Values are the means of trials performed in triplicate; b g of compound/100g of saffron, dry basis.
Figure 1Structure of crocetin esters, picrocrocin and parabens. In the case of crocetin esters with cis-configuration, the position of the substitutes R1 and R2 could not be exactly determined in relation to the C13-14 bond.
Degradation rate constant (k), determination coefficient (R2) and half-life period (t1/2) of overall, trans, cis and individual crocetin esters in saffron aqueous extract in presence of methylparaben and propylparaben, respectively, at 25 ºC.
| Crocetin esters | Methylparaben | |||||||||||
| 50 mg/L | 100 mg/L | 150 mg/L | 200 mg/L | |||||||||
| (K±SD)*103 (h-1) | R2 | t1/2 (h) | (K±SD)*103 (h-1) | R2 | t1/2 (h) | (K±SD)* 103 (h-1) | R2 | t1/2 (h) | (K±SD)*103 (h-1) | R2 | t1/2 (h) | |
| Total crocetin esters | 17.6 | 0.989 | 39 | 14.8 | 0.966 | 47 | 9.4 | 0.974 | 74 | 8.8 | 0.972 | 79 |
| Total
| 18.2 | 0.987 | 38 | 15.5 | 0.964 | 45 | 9.2 | 0.977 | 75 | 9.2 | 0.971 | 75 |
| Total
| 6.8 | 0.931 | 101 | 6.4 | 0.930 | 108 | 4.1 | 0.939 | 169 | 2.6 | 0.840 | 267 |
| Trans-4-GG | 24.3 | 0.996 | 29 | 20.4 | 0.920 | 34 | 9.6 | 0.999 | 72 | 8.2 | 0.940 | 85 |
| Trans-3-Gg | 10.1 | 0.966 | 69 | 10.0 | 0.950 | 69 | 9.7 | 0.903 | 71 | 9.4 | 0.923 | 74 |
| Trans-2-G | 26.4 | 0.961 | 26 | * | * | * | ||||||
| Cis-4-GG | 14.9 | 0.917 | 47 | 9.7 | 0.981 | 71 | 6.6 | 0.938 | 105 | 5.0 | 0.915 | 139 |
| Cis-3-Gg | 9.2 | 0.947 | 75 | 4.6 | 0.983 | 151 | * | * | ||||
| Propylparaben | ||||||||||||
| 50 mg/L | 100 mg/L | 150 mg/L | 200 mg/L | |||||||||
| Total crocetin esters | 14.4 | 0.995 | 48 | 13.1 | 0.983 | 54 | 11.8 | 0.958 | 83 | 7.5 | 0.988 | 92 |
| Total
| 14.2 | 0.998 | 49 | 12.8 | 0.961 | 52 | 9.6 | 0.971 | 80 | 7.8 | 0.978 | 86 |
| Total
| 8.0 | 0.940 | 94 | 7.3 | 0.989 | 99 | * | * | ||||
| Trans-4-GG | 14.8 | 0.998 | 47 | 14.3 | 0.990 | 48 | 8.5 | 0.982 | 82 | 7.4 | 0.981 | 94 |
| Trans-3-Gg | 11.7 | 0.980 | 59 | 4.9 | 0.917 | 141 | 4.3 | 0.944 | 161 | 4.3 | 0.971 | 161 |
| Trans-2-G | 16.2 | 0.930 | 43 | 15.2 | 0.916 | 46 | * | * | ||||
| Cis-4-GG | 16.0 | 0.996 | 43 | 11.4 | 0.922 | 61 | 8.4 | 0.999 | 83 | 8.2 | 0.923 | 85 |
| Cis-3-Gg | 9.9 | 0.946 | 70 | 9.0 | 0.938 | 77 | * | * | ||||
* First-order kinetics was not followed, crocetin ester content was constant
Quality characteristics and content of each crocetin ester in saffron aqueous extracts coming from Greece, Italy, Spain and Iran, stabilized by means of propylparaben addition (200 mg/L).
| Country |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Moisture & volatile content % ± SD | 8.51±0.69 | 8.78±0.43 | 6.59±1.24 | 7.29±0.57 | ||||||||
| Colouring strength ± SD | 239.30±9.87 | 279.14±12.15 | 260.63±20.39 | 233.11±7.86 | ||||||||
|
| Mean content (g/100g) | (Content± SD)% | Δ mean content*±SD | Mean content (g/100g) | (Content± SD)% | Δ mean content*±SD | Mean content (g/100g) | (Content± SD)% | Δ mean content*±SD | Mean content (g/100g) | (Content± SD)% | Δ mean content*±SD |
|
| 25.94b | 100.00±0.01 | 1.08±0.58 | 29.88c | 100.02±0.03 | 1.42±1.09 | 29.31c | 100.00±0.01 | -1.94±0.19 | 24.99a | 100.00±0.01 | 1.55±0.37 |
|
| 20.37a | 83.86a±0.93 | 0.99±0.12 | 26.67c | 91.53c±0.65 | 1.45±1.07 | 22.98b | 85.26a±1.45 | -0.70±0.27 | 20.94a | 88.09b±1.97 | 1.22±0.34 |
|
| 5.57b | 16.14c±0.93 | 0.96±0.34 | 3.21a | 8.41a±0.65 | 0.73±0.41 | 6.33b | 14.74c±1.45 | 1.52±0.72 | 4.05a | 11.91b±1.97 | 1.60±0.46 |
| 11.77a | 44.79a±2.57 | 2.29±0.59 | 17.79c | 58.05d±1.44 | 2.56±0.62 | 14.35b | 50.15c±3.07 | 1.92±0.61 | 12.03a | 47.01b±1.38 | 4.21±0.60 | |
| 5.75a | 26.25ab±0.84 | -0.92±0.12 | 6.63a | 25.92a±1.39 | 0.90±0.79 | 6.55a | 27.45b±2.29 | -1.13±0.32 | 6.37a | 29.84c±1.54 | -1.27±0.25 | |
| 1.37c | 7.78c±0.95 | -2.61±0.41 | 0.50a | 2.46a±0.53 | -2.21±1.65 | 0.55a | 2.87a±0.88 | -2.32±0.59 | 1.01b | 5.89b±1.77 | -4.50±0.31 | |
| 3.44b | 9.33b±0.48 | 1.97±0.43 | 2.06a | 5.74a±0.75 | 1.41±1.27 | 4.51c | 9.63b±3.37 | 1.32±0.21 | 2.57ab | 7.16a±1.25 | 2.83±0.49 | |
| 1.93b | 6.26c±0.94 | -0.75±0.49 | 0.89a | 2.08a±0.28 | 2.14±0.78 | 1.46a | 4.35b±1.46 | -1.26±0.50 | 1.16ab | 3.78b±0.72 | -0.91±0.45 | |
() Number of samples analyzed for each country. * Δ mean content % between 0 and 24 h. Different letters between rows indicate significant differences at 0.05% level.
Figure 2Correlation between colouring strength and mean content of total, trans and cis crocetin esters in samples from Greece, Italy, Spain and Iran.
Figure 3Scheme of workplan.