Literature DB >> 19325337

Free radial forearm flap lip reconstruction: a clinical series and case reports of technical refinements.

Mahendra Daya1, Veneshree Nair.   

Abstract

Lip reconstruction is best suited to the dictum of replacement of like tissue with like. The use of the remaining lip in the use of the lip reconstruction becomes more difficult as the size of the defect increases. The use of local tissue for subtotal lower lip loss problems like microstomia and facial and commissure distortion are real risks. The use of free tissue transfer becomes especially an attractive option when in addition to the lip there is associated loss of other aesthetic units and/or mandibular bone loss. The potential value of local perioral tissue is more likely to maintain dynamic and sensory function of the lip.Five patients were included in the clinical series during a period of 3 1/2 years since January 2002. All 5 patients were men. The age ranged from 15 to 67 years. Four patients underwent reconstruction by composite radial forearm flaps including both the cutaneous nerve of the forearm and the palmaris longus tendon. A single patient in this group had a partial brachioradialis muscle flap raised as chimeric component to the composite radial forearm flap. In the fifth patient, 2 simultaneous free radial forearm flaps were used for both upper and lower lip and bilateral buccal mucosal reconstruction. All patients achieved the goals of providing an adequate mouth opening with competence. The refinement of dynamic palmaris sling attachment to the perioral muscle provided for very good oral competence and support. In the single patient, adding bulk with the brachioradialis muscle to the neo lower lip most likely served to improve both aesthetics and lip function. With the use of free flaps an adequate labial sulcus, near dynamic sphincter control and sensation can be restored. The major drawback, however, is aesthetics of the lip. Further refinements like vermillion tattooing, fat injections or defatting by liposuction, and secondary mucosal flap surgery to provide the neolip with a vermillion are beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19325337     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31818b4515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

1.  Combined rotation and advancement flap reconstruction for a defect of the upper lip: 2 cases.

Authors:  Junsang Lee; Suk Joon Oh; Sung Won Jung; Sung Hoon Koh
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-10

2.  Simultaneous reconstruction of the oral commissure, lip and buccal mucosa with microvascular transfer of combined first-second toe web and dorsalis pedis flap.

Authors:  Pedro Ciudad; Michele Maruccia; Stamatis Sapountzis; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Pre-expanded bipedicled visor flap: an ideal option for the reconstruction of upper and lower lip defects postburn in Asian males.

Authors:  Peiru Min; Jie Li; Beniamino Brunetti; Zheming Pu; Weijie Su; Wenjing Xi; Zheng Zhang; Rosa Salzillo; Shaoqing Feng; Yixin Zhang
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 4.  Lip Reconstruction after Tumor Ablation.

Authors:  Ali Ebrahimi; Mohammad Hossein Kalantar Motamedi; Azin Ebrahimi; Mohammad Kazemi; Amin Shams; Haleh Hashemzadeh
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01

5.  Microcystic adnexal carcinoma of the upper lip misdiagnosed benign desmoplastic trichoepithelioma.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Stefan Zwerger; Matthies Pörksen; Klaus Junker
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-31

6.  Dorsalis Pedis Free Flap: The Salvage Option following Failure of the Radial Forearm Flap in Total Lower Lip Reconstruction.

Authors:  Theodoros Stathas; Georgios Tsinias; Dimitra Tsiliboti; Aris Tsiros; Nicholas Mastronikolis; Panos Goumas
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2014-04-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.