Literature DB >> 1932481

Comparison of rat and human intestinal perfusion models for assessing efficacy of oral rehydration solutions.

J B Hunt1, E J Elliott, M J Farthing.   

Abstract

The optimal composition for oral rehydration solutions remains controversial. Animal models have been used to assess the efficacy of new formulations but the relevance of these studies to the handling of oral rehydration solutions in human intestine during diarrhoeal disease states remains uncertain. Using steady state perfusion techniques we have compared water and solute transport from a variety of oral rehydration solutions in both the entire rat small intestine and in the human jejunum. Overall the pattern of water, sodium and glucose absorption was similar from the three oral rehydration solutions tested, indicating close parallelism between the two models despite the species and methodological differences. Although the relationship between the findings of these studies to the handling of oral rehydration solution in diarrhoeal disease states remains uncertain, we believe they do support the view that animal models may have a part to play in the preliminary screening of oral rehydration solutions before clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1932481     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1991.tb00005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  3 in total

1.  Search for the ideal oral rehydration solution: studies in a model of secretory diarrhoea.

Authors:  E J Elliott; A J Watson; J A Walker-Smith; M J Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Evidence of a dominant role for low osmolality in the efficacy of cereal based oral rehydration solutions: studies in a model of secretory diarrhoea.

Authors:  A V Thillainayagam; S Carnaby; J A Dias; M L Clark; M J Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Does fluid flow across the intestinal mucosa affect quantitative oral drug absorption? Is it time for a reevaluation?

Authors:  H Lennernäs
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.200

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.