Literature DB >> 19324787

Poor horse traders: large mammals trade survival for reproduction during the process of feralization.

Sophie Grange1, Patrick Duncan, Jean-Michel Gaillard.   

Abstract

We investigated density dependence on the demographic parameters of a population of Camargue horses (Equus caballus), individually monitored and unmanaged for eight years. We also analysed the contributions of individual demographic parameters to changes in the population growth rates. The decrease in resources caused a loss of body condition. Adult male survival was not affected, but the survival of foals and adult females decreased with increasing density. Prime-aged females maintained high reproductive performance at high density, and their survival decreased. The higher survival of adult males compared with females at high density presumably results from higher investment in reproduction by mares. The high fecundity in prime-aged females, even when at high density, may result from artificial selection for high reproductive performance, which is known to have occurred in all the major domestic ungulates. Other studies suggest that feral ungulates including cattle and sheep, as these horses, respond differently from wild ungulates to increases in density, by trading adult survival for reproduction. As a consequence, populations of feral animals should oscillate more strongly than their wild counterparts, since they should be both more invasive (as they breed faster), and more sensitive to harsh environmental conditions (as the population growth rate of long-lived species is consistently more sensitive to a given proportional change in adult survival than to the same change in any other vital rate). If this principle proves to be general, it has important implications for management of populations of feral ungulates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324787      PMCID: PMC2674491          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

Review 1.  Complex numerical responses to top-down and bottom-up processes in vertebrate populations.

Authors:  A R E Sinclair; Charles J Krebs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Two complementary paradigms for analysing population dynamics.

Authors:  Charles J Krebs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The relative roles of density and climatic variation on population dynamics and fecundity rates in three contrasting ungulate species.

Authors:  T Coulson; E J Milner-Gulland; T Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Testing the irruptive paradigm of large-herbivore dynamics.

Authors:  David M Forsyth; Peter Caley
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Estimating individual contributions to population growth: evolutionary fitness in ecological time.

Authors:  T Coulson; T G Benton; P Lundberg; S R X Dall; B E Kendall; J-M Gaillard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Adaptive explanation in socio-ecology: lessons from the Equidae.

Authors:  W L Linklater
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

7.  Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Reproduction in feral horses.

Authors:  J D Feist; D R McCullough
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  1975-10

9.  Sex- and age-specific survival of the highly dimorphic Alpine ibex: evidence for a conservative life-history tactic.

Authors:  Carole Toïgo; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Emilie Largo; Jacques Michallet; Daniel Maillard
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Evidence for a genetic basis of aging in two wild vertebrate populations.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Daniel H Nussey; Josephine M Pemberton; Jill G Pilkington; Alison Morris; Fanie Pelletier; Timothy H Clutton-Brock; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Interacting effects of age, density, and weather on survival and current reproduction for a large mammal.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Richard; Steven E Simpson; Sarah A Medill; Philip D McLoughlin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Population dynamics of western gorillas at Mbeli Bai.

Authors:  Andrew M Robbins; Marie L Manguette; Thomas Breuer; Milou Groenenberg; Richard J Parnell; Claudia Stephan; Emma J Stokes; Martha M Robbins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Individual quality and age but not environmental or social conditions modulate costs of reproduction in a capital breeder.

Authors:  Lucie Debeffe; Jocelyn Poissant; Philip D McLoughlin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  A Ten-Stage Protocol for Assessing the Welfare of Individual Non-Captive Wild Animals: Free-Roaming Horses (Equus Ferus Caballus) as an Example.

Authors:  Andrea M Harvey; Ngaio J Beausoleil; Daniel Ramp; David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  How much energetic trade-offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species.

Authors:  Frédéric Douhard; Mathieu Douhard; Hélène Gilbert; Philippe Monget; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Jean-François Lemaître
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.183

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.