Literature DB >> 19324681

Methods for improving simulations of biological systems: systemic computation and fractal proteins.

Peter J Bentley1.   

Abstract

Modelling and simulation are becoming essential for new fields such as synthetic biology. Perhaps the most important aspect of modelling is to follow a clear design methodology that will help to highlight unwanted deficiencies. The use of tools designed to aid the modelling process can be of benefit in many situations. In this paper, the modelling approach called systemic computation (SC) is introduced. SC is an interaction-based language, which enables individual-based expression and modelling of biological systems, and the interactions between them. SC permits a precise description of a hypothetical mechanism to be written using an intuitive graph-based or a calculus-based notation. The same description can then be directly run as a simulation, merging the hypothetical mechanism and the simulation into the same entity. However, even when using well-designed modelling tools to produce good models, the best model is not always the most accurate one. Frequently, computational constraints or lack of data make it infeasible to model an aspect of biology. Simplification may provide one way forward, but with inevitable consequences of decreased accuracy. Instead of attempting to replace an element with a simpler approximation, it is sometimes possible to substitute the element with a different but functionally similar component. In the second part of this paper, this modelling approach is described and its advantages are summarized using an exemplar: the fractal protein model. Finally, the paper ends with a discussion of good biological modelling practice by presenting lessons learned from the use of SC and the fractal protein model.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324681      PMCID: PMC2843958          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0505.focus

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  7 in total

1.  Can robots make good models of biological behaviour?

Authors:  B Webb
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Evolving beyond perfection: an investigation of the effects of long-term evolution on fractal gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Peter J Bentley
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2004 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  System identification: a multi-signal approach for probing neural cardiovascular regulation.

Authors:  Xinshu Xiao; Thomas J Mullen; Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  A system for modelling cell-cell interactions during plant morphogenesis.

Authors:  Lionel Dupuy; Jonathan Mackenzie; Tim Rudge; Jim Haseloff
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model.

Authors:  F G Varela; H R Maturana; R Uribe
Journal:  Curr Mod Biol       Date:  1974-05

6.  Abstract of the Seventeenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2008. Portland, Oregon, USA. July 19-20, 2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Proceedings of the 2008 MidSouth Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Society (MCBIOS) Conference.

Authors:  Jonathan D Wren; Dawn Wilkins; James C Fuscoe; Susan Bridges; Stephen Winters-Hilt; Yuriy Gusev
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Synthetic biology: history, challenges and prospects.

Authors:  Jim Haseloff; Jim Ajioka
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  The challenges of informatics in synthetic biology: from biomolecular networks to artificial organisms.

Authors:  Gil Alterovitz; Taro Muso; Marco F Ramoni
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 11.622

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.