Literature DB >> 19324613

Coping with environmental uncertainty: dynamic bet hedging as a maternal effect.

Angela J Crean1, Dustin J Marshall.   

Abstract

Mothers in a range of taxa manipulate the phenotype of their offspring in response to environmental change in order to maximize their own fitness. Most studies have focused on changes in the mean phenotype of offspring. Focusing on mean offspring phenotypes is appropriate for species in which mothers are likely to successfully predict the environment their offspring will experience, but what happens when the offspring's environment is unpredictable? Theory suggests that when mothers face uncertainty regarding their offspring's environment, they should increase within-clutch variation in the offspring phenotype (i.e. they should bet hedge). While comparative analyses support the idea that mothers do bet hedge in response to environmental unpredictability, empirical tests are very rare and it remains unclear whether mothers adaptively adjust variance in offspring traits (a phenomenon we call dynamic bet hedging). As a first step towards examining dynamic bet hedging, we reanalysed data from five previously published studies. These studies were across a range of taxa, but all manipulated the maternal environment/phenotype and then examined changes in mean offspring size. We found some support for the theoretical predictions that mothers should increase within-clutch offspring size variation when faced with unpredictable environments. We predict that dynamic bet hedging is more common than previously anticipated and suggest that it has some interesting implications for the studies that focus on shifts in mean offspring traits alone. Hence, future studies should examine maternal effects on both the mean and the variance of offspring traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324613      PMCID: PMC2666679          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  22 in total

1.  Developmental dimorphism: consequences for larval behavior and dispersal potential in a marine gastropod.

Authors:  Patrick J Krug; Richard K Zimmer
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.818

2.  Maternal condition influences phenotypic selection on offspring.

Authors:  Monica Gagliano; Mark I McCormick
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers.

Authors:  Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-11-06       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Absolute fitness, relative fitness, and utility.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  The evolutionary ecology of offspring size in marine invertebrates.

Authors:  Dustin J Marshall; Michael J Keough
Journal:  Adv Mar Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.143

6.  Does within-population variation in fish egg size reflect maternal influences on optimal values?

Authors:  Sigurd Einum; Ian A Fleming
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Offspring size variation within broods as a bet-hedging strategy in unpredictable environments.

Authors:  Dustin J Marshall; Russell Bonduriansky; Luc F Bussière
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Gamete plasticity in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate.

Authors:  Angela J Crean; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects.

Authors:  Tobias Uller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Seed size variability: from carob to carats.

Authors:  Lindsay A Turnbull; Luis Santamaria; Toni Martorell; Joan Rallo; Andy Hector
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Parental effects in ecology and evolution: mechanisms, processes and implications.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Maternal effects in cooperative breeders: from hymenopterans to humans.

Authors:  Andrew F Russell; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolution of maternal effects: past and present.

Authors:  Timothy A Mousseau; Tobias Uller; Erik Wapstra; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Hormonally mediated maternal effects, individual strategy and global change.

Authors:  Sandrine Meylan; Donald B Miles; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Asymmetric dispersal can maintain larval polymorphism: a model motivated by Streblospio benedicti.

Authors:  Christina Zakas; David W Hall
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Mediation of seed provisioning in the transmission of environmental maternal effects in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton).

Authors:  R Zas; C Cendán; L Sampedro
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Spatiotemporal environmental variation, risk aversion, and the evolution of cooperative breeding as a bet-hedging strategy.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evolutionary tipping points in the capacity to adapt to environmental change.

Authors:  Carlos A Botero; Franz J Weissing; Jonathan Wright; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Among-sibling differences in the phenotypes of juvenile fish depend on their location within the egg mass and maternal dominance rank.

Authors:  Tim Burton; M O Hoogenboom; N D Beevers; J D Armstrong; N B Metcalfe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  To breed or not to breed: past reproductive status and environmental cues drive current breeding decisions in a long-lived amphibian.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Aurélien Besnard; Eric Bonnaire; Haize Perret; Justine Rivoalen; Claude Miaud; Pierre Joly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.