Literature DB >> 19324145

Indexed left ventricular dimensions best predict survival after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve regurgitation.

Morgan L Brown1, Hartzell V Schaff, Rakesh M Suri, Zhuo Li, Li Zhuo, Thoralf M Sundt, Joseph A Dearani, Richard C Daly, Thomas A Orszulak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indications for valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation include diminished ejection fraction and increased left ventricular dimensions. Our objective was to examine the effect of preoperative ejection fraction and left ventricular dimensions on survival and return of normal systolic function (ejection fraction > or = 0.50) after valve replacement for aortic regurgitation.
METHODS: Between 1996 and 2006, 301 patients had aortic valve replacement for moderate or greater chronic aortic regurgitation, and 29% had concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta. We reviewed clinical and echocardiographic variables as well as late vital status.
RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 55.2 +/- 16.5 years, and 78% were male. The mean preoperative ejection fraction was 0.56 +/- 0.12, the mean left ventricular end-systolic dimension was 43 +/- 10 mm, and the mean left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 63 +/- 9 mm. Operative mortality was 1.7%, and survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96%, 90%, and 77%, respectively. This was similar to an age- and sex-matched population (p = 0.214). The level of ejection fraction preoperatively did not predict late survival, nor did absolute values for left ventricular end-systolic dimension and end-diastolic dimension. Indexed left ventricular end-systolic dimension and end-diastolic dimension were predictors (p < 0.01) of late survival. Data from late echocardiography were available for 159 patients (56%) at a mean follow-up of 3.3 +/- 2.6 years. Preoperative ejection fraction, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, indexed end-systolic dimension, end-diastolic dimension, and indexed end-diastolic dimension were univariately predictive of late ejection fraction. In a multivariate model the only predictor of late normal ejection fraction was a higher preoperative ejection fraction (odds ratio, 2.85; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received a valve replacement for aortic regurgitation, decreased ejection fraction and increased left ventricular dimensions were not associated with late mortality. However, larger indexed left ventricular systolic and diastolic dimensions were associated with late mortality. Preservation of late ejection fraction is best if the operation is performed in patients with near normal preoperative left ventricular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324145     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary reviews by surgeon: timing of operation for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Taniguchi; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-09-26

2.  Mixed aortic valve disease in the young: initial observations.

Authors:  Allison C Hill; David W Brown; Steven D Colan; Kimberly Gauvreau; Pedro J del Nido; James E Lock; Rahul H Rathod
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Long term results and predictors of left ventricular function recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Koichi Arinaga; Satoshi Kikusaki; Yuichiro Hirata; Kumiko Wada; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Hiroyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 4.  Aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Relationship between enlarged cardiac silhouette on chest X-ray and left ventricular size on transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Soohyun A Chang; Jeffrey Yim; Darwin F Yeung; Ken Gin; John Jue; Parvathy Nair; Michael Y C Tsang; Edel Kelliher; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Timing of Surgical Intervention for Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Brett Hiendlmayr; Joseph Nakda; Ossama Elsaid; Xuan Wang; Aidan Flynn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11

Review 7.  Timing of aortic valve intervention in pediatric chronic aortic insufficiency.

Authors:  Justin T Tretter; Alan Langsner
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Time course of left ventricular remodelling and mechanics after aortic valve surgery: aortic stenosis vs. aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  E Mara Vollema; Gurpreet K Singh; Edgard A Prihadi; Madelien V Regeer; See Hooi Ewe; Arnold C T Ng; Bart J A Mertens; Robert J M Klautz; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Reverse remodelling after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Ayumi Koga-Ikuta; Satsuki Fukushima; Naonori Kawamoto; Tetsuya Saito; Yusuke Shimahara; Shin Yajima; Naoki Tadokoro; Takashi Kakuta; Toshihiro Fukui; Tomoyuki Fujita
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28

10.  Prognostic factors associated with postoperative adverse outcomes in patients with aortic valve prolapse.

Authors:  Yanping Ruan; Xiaowei Liu; Xu Meng; Haibo Zhang; Yihua He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.