Literature DB >> 19324066

Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.

Jillian H Fecteau1, Ilia Korjoukov, Pieter R Roelfsema.   

Abstract

Are locations or colors more effective cues in biasing attention? We addressed this question with a visual search task that featured an associative priming manipulation. The observers indicated which target appeared in a search array. Unknown to them, one target appeared at the same location more often and a second target appeared in the same color more often. Both location and color biases facilitated performance, but location biases benefited the selection of all targets, whereas color biases only benefited the associated target letter. The generalized benefit of location biases suggests that locations are more effective cues to attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324066     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  3 in total

1.  Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.

Authors:  Rongqi Lin; Xinyu Li; Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.

Authors:  Harriet Goschy; Sarolta Bakos; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

3.  Spatial enhancement due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Yihan Yang; Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.