Literature DB >> 19323871

Contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity.

Kenneth I Shulman1, Carmelle Peisah, Robin Jacoby, Jeremia Heinik, Sanford Finkel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Challenges to wills on the basis of lack of testamentary capacity and/or undue influence are likely to increase over the next generation. Since contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity can be a powerful influence on the outcome of such challenges, there will be an associated increase in requests for expert assessment of testamentary capacity. There is a need to provide such potential experts with the knowledge and guidelines necessary to conduct assessments that will be helpful to the judicial system.
METHODS: A subcommittee of the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) task force on "Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence" was formed to establish guidelines for contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity.
RESULTS: The task-specific criteria for testamentary capacity as outlined by Lord Chief Justice Cockburn in the well-known Banks v. Goodfellow case are described. Additional issues are identified for probing and documentation. This is designed to determine whether the testator can formulate a coherent, rational testamentary plan that connects his/her beliefs, values and relationships with the proposed disposition of assets. Rules of engagement by the expert assessor are defined as well as an approach to the clinical examination for testamentary capacity resulting in a clear and relevant report.
CONCLUSION: Guidelines for experts who are asked to provide a contemporaneous opinion on testamentary capacity should help to inform disputes resulting from challenges to wills. A consistent clinical approach will help the courts to make their determinations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19323871     DOI: 10.1017/S1041610209008874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr        ISSN: 1041-6102            Impact factor:   3.878


  6 in total

1.  The marriage of psychology and law: testamentary capacity.

Authors:  Simon Zuscak; Ian Coyle; Patrick Keyzer; M Anthony Machin
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2019-04-04

2.  The Testamentary Capacity Assessment Tool (TCAT): validation and normative data.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Chiara Gramegna; Antonella Esposito; Edoardo Nicolò Aiello; Teresa Difonzo; Stefano Zago
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.830

3.  A Comprehensive Approach to Assessment of Testamentary Capacity.

Authors:  Amanda Kenepp; Ellen Johnson; Grace J Lee; Preeti Sunderaraman; Natalie L Denburg; Christopher M Nguyen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-23

4.  Mental capacity including testamentary capacity.

Authors:  Pronob Kumar Dalal; Adarsh Tripathi; Sujita Kumar Kar; Choudhary Laxmi Narayan; Abhay Matkar
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Testing for Testamentary Capacity in the Older Adult: A Model of Ethical Considerations for the Clinical Neuropsychologist.

Authors:  Anne I Roche
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-22

Review 6.  A Case for the Standardized Assessment of Testamentary Capacity.

Authors:  Megan Brenkel; Kimberley Whaley; Nathan Herrmann; Kerri Crawford; Elias Hazan; Laura Cardiff; Adrian M Owen; Kenneth Shulman
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2018-03-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.