Literature DB >> 19323232

Does interspecific competition affect offspring provisioning?

Dustin J Marshall1, Michael J Keough.   

Abstract

Offspring size is one of the most well-studied life-history traits, yet it is remarkable that few field studies have examined the manner in which the relationship between offspring size and performance (and thus, optimal offspring size) is affected by the local environment. Furthermore, while offspring size appears to be plastic in a range of organisms, few studies have linked changes in offspring size to changes in the relationship between offspring size and performance in the field. Interspecific competition is a major ecological force in both terrestrial and marine environments, but we have little understanding of its role in shaping selection on offspring size. Here we examine the effect of interspecific competition on the relationship between offspring size and performance in the field for the marine bryozoan Watersipora subtorquata along the south coast of Australia. Both interspecific competition and offspring size had strong effects on the post-metamorphic performance of offspring in the field, but importantly, they acted independently. While interspecific competition did not affect the offspring size-performance relationship, mothers experiencing competition still produced larger offspring than mothers that did not experience competition. Because larger offspring are more dispersive in this species, increasing offspring size may represent a maternal strategy whereby mothers produce more dispersive offspring when they experience high competition themselves. This study shows that, while offspring size is plastic in this species, post-metamorphic factors alone may not determine the size of offspring that mothers produce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19323232     DOI: 10.1890/08-0320.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

1.  Metabolic rate covaries with fitness and the pace of the life history in the field.

Authors:  Amanda K Pettersen; Craig R White; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Trait-fitness associations do not predict within-species phenotypic evolution over 2 million years.

Authors:  Emanuela Di Martino; Lee Hsiang Liow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Relationships among egg size, composition, and energy: a comparative study of geminate sea urchins.

Authors:  Justin S McAlister; Amy L Moran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The adaptive significance of population differentiation in offspring size of the least killifish, Heterandria formosa.

Authors:  Jeff Leips; F Helen Rodd; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Double trouble at high density: cross-level test of resource-related adaptive plasticity and crowding-related fitness.

Authors:  André Gergs; Thomas G Preuss; Annemette Palmqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.