Literature DB >> 19323206

Communication towers, lights, and birds: successful methods of reducing the frequency of avian collisions.

Joelle Gehring1, Paul Kerlinger, Albert M Manville.   

Abstract

Estimates suggest that each year millions of birds, predominantly Neotropical migrating songbirds, collide with communication towers. To determine the relative collision risks that different nighttime Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) communication tower obstruction lighting systems pose to night-migrating birds, we compared fatalities at towers with different systems: white strobe lights only; red strobe-like lights only; red, flashing, incandescent lights only; and red, strobe-like lights combined with non-flashing, steady-burning, red lights. Avian fatality data used to compare these tower light systems were collected simultaneously in Michigan on 20 consecutive days during early morning hours during peak songbird migration at 24 towers in May and September 2005 (total = 40 days). Twenty-one towers were 116-146 m above ground level (AGL), and three were > or = 305 m AGL. During the two 20-day sample periods, we found a mean of 3.7 birds under 116-146 m AGL towers equipped with only red or white flashing obstruction lights, whereas towers with non-flashing/steady-burning lights in addition to the flashing lights were responsible for 13.0 fatalities per season. Kruskal-Wallis test, ANOVA, Student's t test, and multiple comparisons procedures determined that towers lit at night with only flashing lights were involved in significantly fewer avian fatalities than towers lit with systems that included the FAA "status quo" lighting system (i.e., a combination of red, flashing lights and red, non-flashing lights). There were no significant differences in fatality rates among towers lit with red strobes, white strobes, and red, incandescent, flashing lights. Results from related studies at the same towers in May and September 2004 and September 2003 provide ancillary support for these findings. Our results suggest that avian fatalities can be reduced, perhaps by 50-71%, at guyed communication towers by removing non-flashing/steady-burning red lights. Our lighting change proposal can be accomplished at minimal cost on existing towers, and such changes on new or existing towers greatly reduce the cost of tower operation. Removing non-flashing lights from towers is one of the most effective and economically feasible means of achieving a significant reduction in avian fatalities at existing communication towers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19323206     DOI: 10.1890/07-1708.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  13 in total

Review 1.  The subtlety of simple eyes: the tuning of visual fields to perceptual challenges in birds.

Authors:  Graham R Martin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  High-intensity urban light installation dramatically alters nocturnal bird migration.

Authors:  Benjamin M Van Doren; Kyle G Horton; Adriaan M Dokter; Holger Klinck; Susan B Elbin; Andrew Farnsworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Collision mortality has no discernible effect on population trends of North American birds.

Authors:  Todd W Arnold; Robert M Zink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An estimate of avian mortality at communication towers in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Travis Longcore; Catherine Rich; Pierre Mineau; Beau MacDonald; Daniel G Bert; Lauren M Sullivan; Erin Mutrie; Sidney A Gauthreaux; Michael L Avery; Robert L Crawford; Albert M Manville; Emilie R Travis; David Drake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Window area and development drive spatial variation in bird-window collisions in an urban landscape.

Authors:  Stephen B Hager; Bradley J Cosentino; Kelly J McKay; Cathleen Monson; Walt Zuurdeeg; Brian Blevins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; John Hopkins
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.528

7.  Migratory bats respond to artificial green light with positive phototaxis.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Manuel Roeleke; Lara Marggraf; Gunārs Pētersons; Silke L Voigt-Heucke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Nature, extent and ecological implications of night-time light from road vehicles.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Lauren A Holt
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.528

9.  A summary of bird mortality at photovoltaic utility scale solar facilities in the Southwestern U.S.

Authors:  Karl Kosciuch; Daniel Riser-Espinoza; Michael Gerringer; Wallace Erickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing bird avoidance of high-contrast lights using a choice test approach: implications for reducing human-induced avian mortality.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Bradley F Blackwell; Travis L DeVault; Patrice E Baumhardt
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.