Literature DB >> 19323192

Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests.

Scott L Stephens1, Jason J Moghaddas, Carl Edminster, Carl E Fiedler, Sally Haase, Michael Harrington, Jon E Keeley, Eric E Knapp, James D McIver, Kerry Metlen, Carl N Skinner, Andrew Youngblood.   

Abstract

Forest structure and species composition in many western U.S. coniferous forests have been altered through fire exclusion, past and ongoing harvesting practices, and livestock grazing over the 20th century. The effects of these activities have been most pronounced in seasonally dry, low and mid-elevation coniferous forests that once experienced frequent, low to moderate intensity, fire regimes. In this paper, we report the effects of Fire and Fire Surrogate (FFS) forest stand treatments on fuel load profiles, potential fire behavior, and fire severity under three weather scenarios from six western U.S. FFS sites. This replicated, multisite experiment provides a framework for drawing broad generalizations about the effectiveness of prescribed fire and mechanical treatments on surface fuel loads, forest structure, and potential fire severity. Mechanical treatments without fire resulted in combined 1-, 10-, and 100-hour surface fuel loads that were significantly greater than controls at three of five FFS sites. Canopy cover was significantly lower than controls at three of five FFS sites with mechanical-only treatments and at all five FFS sites with the mechanical plus burning treatment; fire-only treatments reduced canopy cover at only one site. For the combined treatment of mechanical plus fire, all five FFS sites with this treatment had a substantially lower likelihood of passive crown fire as indicated by the very high torching indices. FFS sites that experienced significant increases in 1-, 10-, and 100-hour combined surface fuel loads utilized harvest systems that left all activity fuels within experimental units. When mechanical treatments were followed by prescribed burning or pile burning, they were the most effective treatment for reducing crown fire potential and predicted tree mortality because of low surface fuel loads and increased vertical and horizontal canopy separation. Results indicate that mechanical plus fire, fire-only, and mechanical-only treatments using whole-tree harvest systems were all effective at reducing potential fire severity under severe fire weather conditions. Retaining the largest trees within stands also increased fire resistance.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19323192     DOI: 10.1890/07-1755.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  8 in total

1.  Incorporating Resource Protection Constraints in an Analysis of Landscape Fuel-Treatment Effectiveness in the Northern Sierra Nevada, CA, USA.

Authors:  Christopher B Dow; Brandon M Collins; Scott L Stephens
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Short and long-term carbon balance of bioenergy electricity production fueled by forest treatments.

Authors:  Katharine C Kelsey; Kallie L Barnes; Michael G Ryan; Jason C Neff
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2014-09-03

3.  Effects of climate variability and accelerated forest thinning on watershed-scale runoff in southwestern USA ponderosa pine forests.

Authors:  Marcos D Robles; Robert M Marshall; Frances O'Donnell; Edward B Smith; Jeanmarie A Haney; David F Gori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Wildfire and climate change adaptation of western North American forests: a case for intentional management.

Authors:  Paul F Hessburg; Susan J Prichard; R Keala Hagmann; Nicholas A Povak; Frank K Lake
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 6.105

5.  Conservation of avian diversity in the Sierra Nevada: moving beyond a single-species management focus.

Authors:  Angela M White; Elise F Zipkin; Patricia N Manley; Matthew D Schlesinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The role of fire in UK peatland and moorland management: the need for informed, unbiased debate.

Authors:  G Matt Davies; Nicholas Kettridge; Cathelijne R Stoof; Alan Gray; Davide Ascoli; Paulo M Fernandes; Rob Marrs; Katherine A Allen; Stefan H Doerr; Gareth D Clay; Julia McMorrow; Vigdis Vandvik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Meta-analysis of avian and small-mammal response to fire severity and fire surrogate treatments in U.S. fire-prone forests.

Authors:  Joseph B Fontaine; Patricia L Kennedy
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 8.  Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions.

Authors:  Susan J Prichard; Paul F Hessburg; R Keala Hagmann; Nicholas A Povak; Solomon Z Dobrowski; Matthew D Hurteau; Van R Kane; Robert E Keane; Leda N Kobziar; Crystal A Kolden; Malcolm North; Sean A Parks; Hugh D Safford; Jens T Stevens; Larissa L Yocom; Derek J Churchill; Robert W Gray; David W Huffman; Frank K Lake; Pratima Khatri-Chhetri
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 6.105

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.