Literature DB >> 19322921

Carbon dioxide for gut distension during digestive endoscopy: technique and practice survey.

Filip Janssens1, Jacques Deviere, Pierre Eisendrath, Jean-Marc Dumonceau.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the adoption of Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation by endoscopists from various European countries, and its determinants.
METHODS: A survey was distributed to 580 endoscopists attending a live course on digestive endoscopy.
RESULTS: The response rate was 24.5%. Fewer than half the respondents (66/142, 46.5%) were aware of the fact that room air can be replaced by CO2 for gut distension during endoscopy, and 4.2% of respondents were actually using CO2 as the insufflation agent. Endoscopists aware of the possibility of CO2 insufflation mentioned technical difficulties in implementing the system and the absence of significant advantages of CO2 in comparison with room air as barriers to adoption in daily practice (84% and 49% of answers, respectively; two answers were permitted for this item).
CONCLUSION: Based on this survey, adoption of CO2 insufflation during endoscopy seems to remain relatively exceptional. A majority of endoscopists were not aware of this possibility, while others were not aware of recent technical developments that facilitate CO2 implementation in an endoscopy suite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19322921      PMCID: PMC2665142          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.1475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  25 in total

1.  Carbon dioxide-insufflated colonoscopy: an ignored superior technique.

Authors:  K Phaosawasdi; W Cooley; J Wheeler; P Rice
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Church; C Delaney
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  The safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopic electrosurgical polypectomy.

Authors:  B H Rogers
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Intestinal response to changing gaseous environments: normobaric and hyperbaric observations.

Authors:  H A Saltzman; H O Sieker
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1968-02-26       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  M Bretthauer; G Hoff; E Thiis-Evensen; T Grotmol; S Thorp Holmsen; V Moritz; E Skovlund
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy.

Authors:  M Bretthauer; E Thiis-Evensen; G Huppertz-Hauss; L Gisselsson; T Grotmol; E Skovlund; G Hoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy.

Authors:  A M Hussein; C I Bartram; C B Williams
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.

Authors:  Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; William S Harmsen; Kenneth P Offord; Ann M Harris; Lynn A Wilson; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Bretthauer; Geir S Hoff; Espen Thiis-Evensen; Gert Huppertz-Hauss; Eva Skovlund
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Adverse renal and metabolic effects associated with oral sodium phosphate bowel preparation.

Authors:  Eliot C Heher; Samuel O Thier; Helmut Rennke; Benjamin D Humphreys
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.237

View more
  10 in total

1.  Technical issues and new devices of ESD of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wan Sik Lee; Jin Woong Cho; Young Dae Kim; Kyu Jong Kim; Byung Ik Jang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gas volume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partial CO2 pressure.

Authors:  Hiro-o Yamano; Kenjirou Yoshikawa; Tomoaki Kimura; Eiichirou Yamamoto; Eiji Harada; Toyoki Kudou; Ryusuke Katou; Yasuko Hayashi; Kentarou Satou
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Xian-Ze Xiong; Si-Jia Wu; Jiong Lu; Yi-Xin Lin; Nan-Sheng Cheng; Tai-Xiang Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A meta-analysis of carbon dioxide versus room air insufflation on patient comfort and key performance indicators at colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ailín C Rogers; Dayna Van De Hoef; Shaheel M Sahebally; Des C Winter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy is safe: a prospective trial of 347 patients.

Authors:  M Geyer; U Guller; Ch Beglinger
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-09-29

6.  Carbon dioxide insufflation in routine colonoscopy is safe and more comfortable: results of a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.

Authors:  M Geyer; U Guller; C Beglinger
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2011-06-15

7.  Screening colonoscopy: The present and the future.

Authors:  Chelsea V Hayman; Dinesh Vyas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Relief Effect of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Transnasal Endoscopy for Health Checks-A Prospective, Double-Blind, Case-Control Trial.

Authors:  Toshio Fujisawa; Hiroshi Fukuda; Naoto Sakamoto; Mariko Hojo; Ko Tomishima; Shigeto Ishii; Hirohide Yokokawa; Mizue Saita; Toshio Naito; Akihito Nagahara; Sumio Watanabe; Hiroyuki Isayama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Precise tumor size measurement under constant pressure by novel real-time micro-electro-mechanical-system hood for proper treatment (with videos).

Authors:  Hirohito Mori; Hidekuni Takao; Hideki Kobara; Noriko Nishiyama; Shintaro Fujihara; Tae Matsunaga; Maki Ayaki; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  COLONOSCOPY: RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INSUFFLATION WITH CARBON DIOXIDE VERSUS AIR.

Authors:  Luiz Gustavo DE-Quadros; Roberto Luiz Kaiser-Júnior; Valter Nilton Felix; Lucio Villar; Josemberg Marins Campos; Vinicius Quintiliano Moutinho Nogueira; André Teixeira; Idiberto José Zotarelli-Filho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.