Literature DB >> 19322047

Strategic performance in hospitals: the use of the balanced scorecard by nurse managers.

David Naranjo-Gil1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The competitive and dynamic health care sector has spurred hospitals into delivering greater flexibility and quality of services while cutting the hospital cost at the same time. However, hospitals differ in the extent to which they achieve these strategic goals. PURPOSES: This article explores the use of a new management tool-the balanced scorecard-which facilitates managers to meet multiple strategic goals. It also analyzes how nurse managers use the balanced scorecard in an interactive or diagnostic way and its subsequent effect on strategic goal achievement (cost reduction and flexibility). It also examines how "balanced" is the balanced scorecard in terms of financial versus nonfinancial measures.
METHODOLOGY: Data were collected from a mail survey sent to 218 nurse managers in Spanish public hospitals. A satisfactory response rate was achieved, with 114 (52.29%) useful answered questionnaires.
FINDINGS: The results show that younger, more tenured, and clinically trained nurse managers would be more likely to use the balanced scorecard in an interactive way. Conversely, older, less tenured, and administratively trained managers would use it diagnostically. The results also indicate that the balanced scorecard facilitates the cost reduction and flexibility in hospitals only when it is used interactively. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This article provides evidence that not only the technical design of the balanced scorecard matters, but also an appropriate use of the balanced scorecard is paramount for achievement of multiple strategic goals. An effective use of the balanced scorecard requires managers to actively stimulate dialogue and agreement among hospital's staff about desirable financial and nonfinancial performance measures in alignment with multiple strategic goals.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19322047     DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31819e8fd0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev        ISSN: 0361-6274


  8 in total

1.  An in-depth discussion and illustration of partial least squares structural equation modeling in health care.

Authors:  Necmi Kemal Avkiran
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-02-08

2.  How to juggle priorities? An interactive tool to provide quantitative support for strategic patient-mix decisions: an ophthalmology case.

Authors:  Paul E Joustra; Jesse de Wit; Nico M Van Dijk; Piet J M Bakker
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-06-04

3.  Do different uses of performance measurement systems in hospitals yield different outcomes?

Authors:  Hilco J van Elten; Berend van der Kolk; Sandra Sülz
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2019-07-23

4.  Are performance measurement systems useful? Perceptions from health care.

Authors:  Chiara Demartini; Sara Trucco
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  The role of hospital managers in quality and patient safety: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anam Parand; Sue Dopson; Anna Renz; Charles Vincent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies.

Authors:  David Naranjo-Gil; María Jesús Sánchez-Expósito; Laura Gómez-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Assessing the Health-Care Risk: The Clinical-VaR, a Key Indicator for Sound Management.

Authors:  Enrique Jiménez-Rodríguez; José Manuel Feria-Domínguez; Alonso Sebastián-Lacave
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Why, what and how do European healthcare managers use performance data? Results of a survey and workshop among members of the European Hospital and Healthcare Federation.

Authors:  Damir Ivankovic; Mircha Poldrugovac; Pascal Garel; Niek S Klazinga; Dionne S Kringos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.