Literature DB >> 19321094

Sagittal plane motion of the hindfoot following ankle arthrodesis: a prospective analysis.

Randolph J Sealey1, Mark S Myerson, Andy Molloy, Cesar Gamba, Clifford Jeng, Bindu Kalesan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The progression of subtalar and midfoot arthritis is well documented following ankle arthrodesis, and gait analysis has suggested that a functional gait pattern following arthrodesis may be due to tarsal hypermobility compensating for lost tibiotalar motion. We present a prospective radiographic study comparing the pre- and postoperative range of motion of the foot following ankle arthrodesis utilizing reliable anatomic landmarks to measure the sagittal range of motion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2006, we performed 154 arthrodesis procedures of the ankle. Patients were suitable for inclusion in this study if an isolated arthrodesis of the ankle was performed for post traumatic arthritis only with a minimum of 1-year followup and who had not undergone any prior nor subsequent hindfoot surgery. Standardized pre- and postoperative passive plantar- and dorsiflexion radiographs were obtained, and reproducible anatomic landmarks were then used to measure and compare tibiotalar, subtalar and medial column (talonavicular, naviculo-middle cuneiform and middle cuneiform-first metatarsal) motion. These measurements were repeated at 6, 12, and a mean of 33 months at final followup evaluation. The SF-36, calcaneal pitch, and the presence of radiographic and symptomatic hindfoot arthritis were noted for each patient pre and postoperatively.
RESULTS: There were 48 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean preoperative sagittal motion (tibiotalar, medial column and subtalar combined) was 37.2 degrees, of which 17.8 degrees was tibiotalar motion. This decreased to a mean of 22.6 degrees postoperatively. The postoperative mean subtalar range of motion increased by 4.1 degrees (from 5.2 degrees to 9.3 degrees) (p < 0.0001), and the medial column motion increased by 2.1 degrees postoperatively (from 14.3 degrees to 16.4 degrees) (p < 0.003). Both of these results were statistically significant. There was a compensatory increase of the combined subtalar and medial column motion after arthrodesis of 10.8%. Using regression analysis, there was a significant correlation between the preoperative tibiotalar motion and the final difference in the subtalar range of motion (p = 0.03) and the combined motion of the medial column and the subtalar joint (p < 0.0001). Quality of life was positively associated with increased compensatory motion of the hindfoot and midfoot after ankle arthrodesis. There was an inverse association between the calcaneal pitch angle and the range of motion postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrated a statistically significant relative hypermobility of the subtalar and medial column joints following ankle arthrodesis, and may account for the functional gait which can be achieved following ankle arthrodesis. The significantly increased subtalar range of movement appeared to cause impingement of the posterior part of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint which may account for the increased incidence of subtalar arthritis following arthrodesis. Preoperative arch height can be used to predict both residual motion and function after ankle arthrodesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321094     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  8 in total

1.  Are our expectations bigger than the results we achieve? a comparative study analysing potential advantages of ankle arthroplasty over arthrodesis.

Authors:  Matthias Braito; Dietmar Dammerer; Gerhard Kaufmann; Stefan Fischler; James Carollo; Andrea Reinthaler; Dennis Huber; Rainer Biedermann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Ankle strength, muscle size, and adipose content following unilateral tibiotalar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Symptomatic anterior subtalar arthrosis after ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-13

4.  Treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: arthrodesis versus total ankle replacement.

Authors:  N Espinosa; G Klammer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Evaluating Prospective Patient-Reported Pain and Function Outcomes After Ankle and Hindfoot Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Manish P Mehta; Mitesh P Mehta; Alain E Sherman; Muhammad Y Mutawakkil; Raheem Bell; Milap S Patel; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2021-10-29

6.  Clinical efficacy of the Ankle Spacer for the treatment of multiple secondary osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Jari Dahmen; J Nienke Altink; Gwendolyn Vuurberg; Coen A Wijdicks; Sjoerd As Stufkens; Gino Mmj Kerkhoffs
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-18

7.  Biomechanics of the natural, arthritic, and replaced human ankle joint.

Authors:  Alberto Leardini; John J O'Connor; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis-Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements.

Authors:  Sophie Schieder; Elena Nemecek; Reinhard Schuh; Alexander Kolb; Reinhard Windhager; Madeleine Willegger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.