Literature DB >> 19320868

Quantitative estimate of the risks and benefits of possible alternative blood donor deferral strategies for men who have had sex with men.

Steven A Anderson1, Hong Yang, Lou M Gallagher, Sharon O'Callaghan, Richard A Forshee, Michael P Busch, Matthew T McKenna, Ian Williams, Alan Williams, Matthew J Kuehnert, Susan Stramer, Steve Kleinman, Jay Epstein, Andrew I Dayton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementation of sensitive screening methods for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis viruses prompts the question of what quantitative risks may result from altered deferral strategies for donation of blood by men who have had sex with men (MSM). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Quantitative probabilistic models were developed to assess changes in the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) associated with blood testing and quarantine release errors (QREs) in the initial year of two hypothetical policy scenarios that would allow donations from donors who have abstained from MSM behavior for at least 5 years (MSM5) or at least 1 year (MSM1).
RESULTS: The MSM5 and MSM1 models, respectively, predicted annual increases in units of HIV-infected blood of 0.5% (0.03 mean additional units; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-1) and 3.0% (0.18 mean additional units; 95% CI, 0-1) over current estimated HIV residual risk using recent, nationwide biologic product deviation reports to estimate QRE rates. These estimates are approximately 10-fold lower than estimates based on New York State QRE data from the previous decade. The models predicted smaller increases in infectious HBV donations.
CONCLUSIONS: QREs remain the most significant preventable source of risk. More accurate inputs, including the percentage of MSM in the population, the percentage of MSM who have abstained from MSM activity for 1 or 5 years, the prevalence of HIV and HBV in MSM who have abstained from MSM activity for 1 or 5 years, the rate of self-deferral, and QRE rates, are required before making more precise predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19320868     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02124.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  7 in total

1.  Reconsidering the lifetime deferral of blood donation by men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Mark A Wainberg; Talia Shuldiner; Karine Dahl; Norbert Gilmore
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Righting Anachronistic Exclusions: The Ethics of Blood Donation by MSM.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv       Date:  2017-01-20

Review 3.  What is the evidence for the change in the blood -donation deferral period for high-risk groups and does it go far enough?

Authors:  Beattie Rh Sturrock; Stuart Mucklow
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Should Men who have sex with Men be allowed to donate blood in Israel?

Authors:  Gary Michael Ginsberg; Eilat Shinar; Eran Kopel; Daniel Chemtob
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-12-13

5.  Attitudes, perceptions and knowledge among men who have sex with men towards the blood donation deferral policy in Israel.

Authors:  Itzchak Levy; Liraz Olmer; Yuval Livnat; Adir Yanko; Eilat Shinar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Surveillance of transfusion-transmissible infections comparison of systems in five developed countries.

Authors:  Sheila F O'Brien; Shimian Zou; Syria Laperche; Lisa J Brant; Clive R Seed; Steven H Kleinman
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2011-09-25

7.  Infectious disease transmission during organ and tissue transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa A Greenwald; Matthew J Kuehnert; Jay A Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.