Literature DB >> 19320859

Recollection is a continuous process: implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory.

Laura Mickes1, Peter E Wais, John T Wixted.   

Abstract

Dual-process theory, which holds that recognition decisions can be based on recollection or familiarity, has long seemed incompatible with signal detection theory, which holds that recognition decisions are based on a singular, continuous memory-strength variable. Formal dual-process models typically regard familiarity as a continuous process (i.e., familiarity comes in degrees), but they construe recollection as a categorical process (i.e., recollection either occurs or does not occur). A continuous process is characterized by a graded relationship between confidence and accuracy, whereas a categorical process is characterized by a binary relationship such that high confidence is associated with high accuracy but all lower degrees of confidence are associated with chance accuracy. Using a source-memory procedure, we found that the relationship between confidence and source-recollection accuracy was graded. Because recollection, like familiarity, is a continuous process, dual-process theory is more compatible with signal detection theory than previously thought.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19320859     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02324.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  44 in total

1.  Two processes support visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Sebastian Guderian; Danielle Brigham; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

3.  Alzheimer's disease can spare local metacognition despite global anosognosia: revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in episodic memory.

Authors:  David A Gallo; Stefanie J Cramer; Jessica T Wong; David A Bennett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Recognition memory and the hippocampus: A test of the hippocampal contribution to recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Annette Jeneson; C Brock Kirwan; Ramona O Hopkins; John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Psychophysics of remembering: to bias or not to bias.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Event memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events.

Authors:  David C Rubin; Sharda Umanath
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Neural correlates of confidence during item recognition and source memory retrieval: evidence for both dual-process and strength memory theories.

Authors:  Scott M Hayes; Norbou Buchler; Jared Stokes; James Kragel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Recall versus familiarity when recall fails for words and scenes: the differential roles of the hippocampus, perirhinal cortex, and category-specific cortical regions.

Authors:  Anthony J Ryals; Anne M Cleary; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Hippocampal and cortical mechanisms at retrieval explain variability in episodic remembering in older adults.

Authors:  Alexandra N Trelle; Valerie A Carr; Scott A Guerin; Monica K Thieu; Manasi Jayakumar; Wanjia Guo; Ayesha Nadiadwala; Nicole K Corso; Madison P Hunt; Celia P Litovsky; Natalie J Tanner; Gayle K Deutsch; Jeffrey D Bernstein; Marc B Harrison; Anna M Khazenzon; Jiefeng Jiang; Sharon J Sha; Carolyn A Fredericks; Brian K Rutt; Elizabeth C Mormino; Geoffrey A Kerchner; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Event-related potential correlates of item and source memory strength.

Authors:  Brion Woroch; Brian D Gonsalves
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.