Literature DB >> 19320786

Practitioner assessments of 'good enough' parenting: factorial survey.

Julie Taylor1, William Lauder, Maxine Moy, Jo Corlett.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to measure health visitors' professional judgements on 'good enough' parenting and identify what factors and combinations of these are important when making such judgements.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between parenting and child health is unclear. Whilst agreement exists that 'good enough' parenting requires boundary setting, consistency and putting the child's needs first, attempting to define 'good enough' parenting in precise terms is complex. When faced with a complex situation, practitioners rely on relatively few factors to form judgements.
DESIGN: Factorial survey methods were employed using vignette techniques.
METHODS: Vignettes were constructed using previous research on those variables, which may influence nurses' judgements, for example, accommodation and child dentition. The level of factors was randomly varied. Two thousand vignettes were administered to a sample of 200 health visitors in two Health Boards who then made a judgement about this scenario. ANALYSIS: Data were analysed through multiple regression with dummy variables and one-way analysis of variance. Regression equations for both good enough mothering and good enough parenting are reported.
RESULTS: The models used are significant predictors of parenting and mothering. Significant predictors on health visitor judgements' were boundary setting in sleep behaviours, type of housing inhabited and health behaviours. Although parenting and mothering are often conflated, health visitors appear to separate these aspects when making judgements based on type of housing.
CONCLUSIONS: Most professionals can articulate what makes a 'good' parent, equally they may have strong views regarding what constitutes 'poor' parenting. The difficulty is in determining when parenting is 'good enough' to provide a child with a nurturing environment. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study suggests that practitioners move their thresholds of what is 'good enough' depending on a narrow range of factors. Awareness of the factors, which influence individuals' judgements is important in safeguarding children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19320786     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02661.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  4 in total

1.  Strengthening care for children with complex mental health conditions: Views of Australian clinicians.

Authors:  Kate Paton; Harriet Hiscock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Development of a factorial survey for use in an international study examining clinicians' likelihood to support the decision to initiate invasive long-term ventilation for a child (the TechChild study).

Authors:  Mary Brigid Quirke; Denise Alexander; Kate Masterson; Jo Greene; Cathal Walsh; Piet Leroy; Jay Berry; Lee Polikoff; Maria Brenner
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.612

3.  Dental neglect as a marker of broader neglect: a qualitative investigation of public health nurses' assessments of oral health in preschool children.

Authors:  Caroline Bradbury-Jones; Nicola Innes; Dafydd Evans; Fiona Ballantyne; Julie Taylor
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Exploring Integration of Care for Children Living with Complex Care Needs across the European Union and European Economic Area.

Authors:  Maria Brenner; Miriam O'Shea; Philip J Larkin; Stine Lundstroem Kamionka; Jay Berry; Harriet Hiscock; Michael Rigby; Mitch Blair
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.120

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.