INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The provision of smoking cessation care to surgical patients before admission can reduce post-operative complications and encourage long-term smoking cessation. Our aim was to show how a comprehensive computer-based smoking cessation intervention, developed to enhance smoking cessation care to surgical patients, addresses barriers to care provision. DESIGN AND METHODS: Consultations with preoperative clinic staff and reviews of the scientific literature were conducted and identified the following barriers to the provision of effective smoking cessation care: a lack of organisational support, perceived patient objection, a lack of systems to identify smokers, a lack of staff time and skill, perceived inability to change care practices, a perceived lack of efficacy of cessation care and the cost of providing care. Based on positive findings of a pilot trial, a comprehensive computer-based smoking cessation intervention was implemented in a preoperative clinic. Data from previous evaluations of the intervention were used to assess the extent to which the intervention addressed clinician barriers to care. RESULTS: The computer-based intervention was found to provide a means to accurately and systematically identify smokers; it required little clinical staff time or skill; it was considered an acceptable form of care by staff and patients; it was effective in encouraging patient cessation and it was inexpensive to deliver relative to other surgical costs. Furthermore, the computer-based intervention continues to operate in the preoperative clinic in the absence of ongoing research support. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of such a model of care should be considered by clinical services interested in reducing the smoking related morbidity and mortality of patients.
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The provision of smoking cessation care to surgical patients before admission can reduce post-operative complications and encourage long-term smoking cessation. Our aim was to show how a comprehensive computer-based smoking cessation intervention, developed to enhance smoking cessation care to surgical patients, addresses barriers to care provision. DESIGN AND METHODS: Consultations with preoperative clinic staff and reviews of the scientific literature were conducted and identified the following barriers to the provision of effective smoking cessation care: a lack of organisational support, perceived patient objection, a lack of systems to identify smokers, a lack of staff time and skill, perceived inability to change care practices, a perceived lack of efficacy of cessation care and the cost of providing care. Based on positive findings of a pilot trial, a comprehensive computer-based smoking cessation intervention was implemented in a preoperative clinic. Data from previous evaluations of the intervention were used to assess the extent to which the intervention addressed clinician barriers to care. RESULTS: The computer-based intervention was found to provide a means to accurately and systematically identify smokers; it required little clinical staff time or skill; it was considered an acceptable form of care by staff and patients; it was effective in encouraging patient cessation and it was inexpensive to deliver relative to other surgical costs. Furthermore, the computer-based intervention continues to operate in the preoperative clinic in the absence of ongoing research support. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of such a model of care should be considered by clinical services interested in reducing the smoking related morbidity and mortality of patients.
Authors: Alex T Ramsey; Ami Chiu; Timothy Baker; Nina Smock; Jingling Chen; Tina Lester; Douglas E Jorenby; Graham A Colditz; Laura J Bierut; Li-Shiun Chen Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Sam McCrabb; Amanda L Baker; John Attia; Zsolt J Balogh; Natalie Lott; Justine Naylor; Ian A Harris; Christopher M Doran; Johnson George; Luke Wolfenden; Eliza Skelton; Billie Bonevski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sam McCrabb; Amanda L Baker; John Attia; Zsolt J Balogh; Natalie Lott; Kerrin Palazzi; Justine Naylor; Ian A Harris; Christopher Doran; Johnson George; Luke Wolfenden; Eliza Skelton; Billie Bonevski Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2017-05-30
Authors: Katy Ellis Hilts; Valerie A Yeager; Harold Kooreman; Regina Smith; Brian Busching; Miranda Spitznagle Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2022 Mar-Apr 01
Authors: Dennis Thomas; Michael J Abramson; Billie Bonevski; Simone Taylor; Susan Poole; Gregory R Weeks; Michael J Dooley; Johnson George Journal: Trials Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Kate Bartlem; Jenny Bowman; Kate Ross; Megan Freund; Paula Wye; Kathleen McElwaine; Karen Gillham; Emma Doherty; Luke Wolfenden; John Wiggers Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Jacqueline M Bailey; Kate M Bartlem; John H Wiggers; Paula M Wye; Emily A L Stockings; Rebecca K Hodder; Alexandra P Metse; Tim W Regan; Richard Clancy; Julia A Dray; Danika L Tremain; Tegan Bradley; Jenny A Bowman Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2019-08-14