B J Doyle1, P A Grace, E G Kavanagh, P E Burke, F Wallis, M T Walsh, T M McGloughlin. 1. Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Materials and Surface Science Institute, University of Limerick, Centre for Applied Biomedical Engineering Research, Limerick, Ireland. barry.doyle@ul.ie
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair is fast becoming the treatment of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms in anatomically suitable patients. 3D reconstructions not only aid conventional 2D measurements but also allow further analyses of the vessel anatomy. METHODS: Computed tomography scan data for four male patients awaiting endovascular repair were obtained. 3D reconstructions were performed to determine measurements. Wall stress was determined on one particular case using finite element analysis. RESULTS: 3D reconstruction allows measurements to be obtained that can be difficult to determine using 2D images. This method complements traditional 2D approaches. Reconstructions also provided imaging of potential anatomical problems. Wall stress results showed key regions that may be possible rupture sites. CONCLUSION: 3D reconstructions greatly aid surgical planning. As stent-graft devices evolve, anatomical difficulties previously considered contraindications to endovascular repair can now be overcome with careful planning. 3D reconstruction is a useful adjunct to assessment and planning of endovascular repair.
BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair is fast becoming the treatment of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms in anatomically suitable patients. 3D reconstructions not only aid conventional 2D measurements but also allow further analyses of the vessel anatomy. METHODS: Computed tomography scan data for four male patients awaiting endovascular repair were obtained. 3D reconstructions were performed to determine measurements. Wall stress was determined on one particular case using finite element analysis. RESULTS: 3D reconstruction allows measurements to be obtained that can be difficult to determine using 2D images. This method complements traditional 2D approaches. Reconstructions also provided imaging of potential anatomical problems. Wall stress results showed key regions that may be possible rupture sites. CONCLUSION: 3D reconstructions greatly aid surgical planning. As stent-graft devices evolve, anatomical difficulties previously considered contraindications to endovascular repair can now be overcome with careful planning. 3D reconstruction is a useful adjunct to assessment and planning of endovascular repair.
Authors: David A Vorp; Brian J Schiro; Marek P Ehrlich; Tatu S Juvonen; M Arisan Ergin; Bartley P Griffith Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: M Truijers; J A Pol; L J Schultzekool; S M van Sterkenburg; M F Fillinger; J D Blankensteijn Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2006-11-28 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Marc L Schermerhorn; A James O'Malley; Ami Jhaveri; Philip Cotterill; Frank Pomposelli; Bruce E Landon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Claudio Storck; Philipp Juergens; Claude Fischer; Olivia Haenni; Franz Ebner; Markus Wolfensberger; Erich Sorantin; Gerhard Friedrich; Markus Gugatschka Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 2.503