BACKGROUND: Most health insurance plans monitor ambulatory care quality using the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), publicly reporting results at the plan level. Plan-level comparisons obscure the influence of patients served or settings where care is delivered. Mental illness, substance abuse, and other physical comorbidities, particularly prevalent among Medicaid beneficiaries, can impact adherence to recommended care. We analyzed individual-level HEDIS measures for diabetes and asthma from 5 Medicaid managed care plans to understand how these factors contribute to quality. METHODS: We used claims and medical records to study HEDIS measures for persistent asthma (n = 9103) and diabetes (n = 1790) among beneficiaries enrolled in Massachusetts' Medicaid program during 2004 and 2005. Logistic regression models included patient-level demographic and health factors, provider type, region, and managed care plan. RESULTS: Alcohol and drug use disorders and emergency department use were associated with lower quality care for most measures. Glycemic control was better for patients with diabetes and severe mental illness. Patients with higher illness burden and with more frequent ambulatory visits received higher quality care for both conditions. Younger adults received recommended care less often than older adults. Quality varied across plans. CONCLUSIONS: Additional efforts to improve quality of care for asthma and diabetes for Medicaid beneficiaries are needed for individuals with substance use disorders and young adults. Although evidence of higher quality for patients with multiple conditions is encouraging, improving quality for comparatively healthier individuals might also produce significant long-term benefits.
BACKGROUND: Most health insurance plans monitor ambulatory care quality using the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), publicly reporting results at the plan level. Plan-level comparisons obscure the influence of patients served or settings where care is delivered. Mental illness, substance abuse, and other physical comorbidities, particularly prevalent among Medicaid beneficiaries, can impact adherence to recommended care. We analyzed individual-level HEDIS measures for diabetes and asthma from 5 Medicaid managed care plans to understand how these factors contribute to quality. METHODS: We used claims and medical records to study HEDIS measures for persistent asthma (n = 9103) and diabetes (n = 1790) among beneficiaries enrolled in Massachusetts' Medicaid program during 2004 and 2005. Logistic regression models included patient-level demographic and health factors, provider type, region, and managed care plan. RESULTS:Alcohol and drug use disorders and emergency department use were associated with lower quality care for most measures. Glycemic control was better for patients with diabetes and severe mental illness. Patients with higher illness burden and with more frequent ambulatory visits received higher quality care for both conditions. Younger adults received recommended care less often than older adults. Quality varied across plans. CONCLUSIONS: Additional efforts to improve quality of care for asthma and diabetes for Medicaid beneficiaries are needed for individuals with substance use disorders and young adults. Although evidence of higher quality for patients with multiple conditions is encouraging, improving quality for comparatively healthier individuals might also produce significant long-term benefits.
Authors: Monica Bharel; Wen-Chieh Lin; Jianying Zhang; Elizabeth O'Connell; Robert Taube; Robin E Clark Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Huang-Tz Ou; Bhramar Mukherjee; Steven R Erickson; John D Piette; Richard P Bagozzi; Rajesh Balkrishnan Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; Patrick J Blatchford; Sophia R Newcomer; John F Steiner; Diane L Fairclough Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: P Todd Korthuis; David A Fiellin; Kathleen A McGinnis; Melissa Skanderson; Amy C Justice; Adam J Gordon; Donna Almario Doebler; Steven M Asch; Lynn E Fiellin; Kendall Bryant; Cynthia L Gibert; Stephen Crystal; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; David Rimland; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Kevin L Kraemer Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Angela M Gerolamo; Jung Y Kim; Jonathan D Brown; James Schuster; Jane Kogan Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Beth Waitzfelder; Catherine Pihoker; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Doug Case; Andrea Anderson; Ronny A Bell; Jean M Lawrence; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Giuseppina Imperatore; Debra Standiford; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Dana Dabelea; Michael Seid Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Emma E McGinty; Elizabeth M Stone; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Sachini Bandara; Karly A Murphy; Elizabeth A Stuart; Michael A Rosenblum; Gail L Daumit Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stewart B Harris; Richard H Glazier; Jordan W Tompkins; Andrew S Wilton; Vijaya Chevendra; Moira A Stewart; Amardeep Thind Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 2.655