BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of combat-related injuries include burns. Previous studies have shown similar mortality rates between military and civilian burn casualties; but causes of death were not detailed. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed autopsy reports of patients with burns treated at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center from 2004 to 2007. RESULTS: Of 1,255 admissions, 100 (8%) died, with autopsies performed on 74 (36 burned during military operations). Causes of death included infection (61%); disorders of the pulmonary (55%), cardiac (36%), renal (27%), gastrointestinal (27%), and central nervous (11%) systems; and multiorgan dysfunction (15%). Patients burned as a result of military operations were younger men with more associated inhalation injuries, greater severity of injury, and longer time from injury to admission and to death. They died more frequently of infection (notably fungus, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella) and gastrointestinal complications; and those not burned in military operations had greater numbers of cardiac and renal causes of death. CONCLUSION: Casualties of military operations are clinically different and die from different causes than patients not burned during military operations. The differences are likely reflective of a younger population, with greater severity of illness and longer times from injury to admission. Therapeutic interventions should focus on prevention of infection and gastrointestinal catastrophes in military burn casualties, which are similar to younger burn patients in the US, and minimizing cardiac complications in civilian burn casualties, who are typically older patients and possibly reflective of patients with more comorbidities.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of combat-related injuries include burns. Previous studies have shown similar mortality rates between military and civilian burn casualties; but causes of death were not detailed. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed autopsy reports of patients with burns treated at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center from 2004 to 2007. RESULTS: Of 1,255 admissions, 100 (8%) died, with autopsies performed on 74 (36 burned during military operations). Causes of death included infection (61%); disorders of the pulmonary (55%), cardiac (36%), renal (27%), gastrointestinal (27%), and central nervous (11%) systems; and multiorgan dysfunction (15%). Patients burned as a result of military operations were younger men with more associated inhalation injuries, greater severity of injury, and longer time from injury to admission and to death. They died more frequently of infection (notably fungus, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella) and gastrointestinal complications; and those not burned in military operations had greater numbers of cardiac and renal causes of death. CONCLUSION: Casualties of military operations are clinically different and die from different causes than patients not burned during military operations. The differences are likely reflective of a younger population, with greater severity of illness and longer times from injury to admission. Therapeutic interventions should focus on prevention of infection and gastrointestinal catastrophes in military burn casualties, which are similar to younger burn patients in the US, and minimizing cardiac complications in civilian burn casualties, who are typically older patients and possibly reflective of patients with more comorbidities.
Authors: Aaron R Farmer; Clinton K Murray; Ian R Driscoll; Brian L Wickes; Nathan Wiederhold; Deanna A Sutton; Carmita Sanders; Katrin Mende; Brent Enniss; James Feig; Anuradha Ganesan; Elizabeth A Rini; Todd J Vento Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: David Fink; Kathleen Romanowski; Vesta Valuckaite; Trissa Babrowski; Moses Kim; Jeffrey B Matthews; Donald Liu; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: J Trauma Date: 2011-12
Authors: Ryan M Huebinger; Ming-Mei Liu; Scot E Dowd; Fernando A Rivera-Chavez; John Boynton; Curtis Carey; Kenneth Hawkins; Christian T Minshall; Steven E Wolf; Joseph P Minei; Robert C Barber Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Elena Y Trizna; Maria N Yarullina; Diana R Baidamshina; Anna V Mironova; Farida S Akhatova; Elvira V Rozhina; Rawil F Fakhrullin; Alsu M Khabibrakhmanova; Almira R Kurbangalieva; Mikhail I Bogachev; Airat R Kayumov Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: David P Nichols; Silvia Caceres; Lindsay Caverly; Cori Fratelli; Sun Ho Kim; Ken Malcolm; Katie R Poch; Milene Saavedra; George Solomon; Jennifer Taylor-Cousar; Samuel Moskowitz; Jerry A Nick Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Tyler Warkentien; Carlos Rodriguez; Bradley Lloyd; Justin Wells; Amy Weintrob; James R Dunne; Anuradha Ganesan; Ping Li; William Bradley; Lakisha J Gaskins; Françoise Seillier-Moiseiwitsch; Clinton K Murray; Eugene V Millar; Bryan Keenan; Kristopher Paolino; Mark Fleming; Duane R Hospenthal; Glenn W Wortmann; Michael L Landrum; Mark G Kortepeter; David R Tribble Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 9.079