Literature DB >> 19317863

Intrathecal neostigmine with bupivacaine for infants undergoing lower abdominal and urogenital procedures: dose response.

Y K Batra1, S Rajeev, N B Panda, V C Lokesh, K L N Rao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal (IT) neostigmine produces dose-dependent analgesia in adults. However, the dose of spinal neostigmine has not been investigated in infants. The purpose of this study was to assess spinal anesthesia (SA) duration provided by four doses of spinal neostigmine added to bupivacaine for lower abdominal and urogenital procedures in infants.
METHODS: Seventy-five infants were randomized into five groups. The control group B received IT plain 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Groups BN.25, BN.50, BN.75, and BN1.0 received bupivacaine with 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 microg/kg of neostigmine, respectively. The primary variable was the duration of anesthesia assessed by recovery of hip flexion. Postoperative pain with facial expression, leg activity, arm activity, crying and consolability scale score, and rescue analgesic requirements were the secondary variables measured, and the side effects were noted.
RESULTS: Seventy-three infants completed the study. There was a significant linear increase in SA duration with IT neostigmine to 65.2 (4.3) min with 0.5 microg/kg (P<0.01), 88.2 (5.1) with 0.75 microg/kg (P<0.001) and 92 (4.3) with 1 microg/kg (P<0.001) from 52.4 (4.3) min with bupivacaine alone. SA duration showed no significant difference between plain bupivacaine and BN.25 (P=0.100) or between groups BN.75 and BN1.0 (P=0.451). Groups BN.75 and BN1.0 had significantly reduced pain scores, and the median duration before the first dose rescue analgesic was requested prolonged significantly (P<0.001) compared with the other three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: IT neostigmine at a dose of 0.75 microg/kg added to bupivacaine significantly prolonged SA duration with reduced postoperative pain scores and rescue analgesic requirements in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urogenital procedures. No additional benefits were provided on increasing it to 1 microg/kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317863     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01837.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  Validation of a preclinical spinal safety model: effects of intrathecal morphine in the neonatal rat.

Authors:  B David Westin; Suellen M Walker; Ronald Deumens; Marjorie Grafe; Tony L Yaksh
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Neuraxial analgesia in neonates and infants: a review of clinical and preclinical strategies for the development of safety and efficacy data.

Authors:  Suellen M Walker; Tony L Yaksh
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  The evolution of spinal/epidural neostigmine in clinical application: Thoughts after two decades.

Authors:  Gabriela Rocha Lauretti
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01

4.  A comparison between intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in the subarachnoid block for elective abdominal hysterectomy operations: A prospective, double-blind and randomized controlled study.

Authors:  D Bhar; S RoyBasunia; A Das; S B Kundu; R C Mondal; P S Halder; S K Mandal; S Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Spinal anesthesia in children: A review.

Authors:  Anju Gupta; Usha Saha
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.