Literature DB >> 19317823

Children and adolescents on intensive insulin therapy maintain postprandial glycaemic control without precise carbohydrate counting.

C E Smart1, K Ross, J A Edge, C E Collins, K Colyvas, B R King.   

Abstract

AIMS: Carbohydrate (CHO) quantification is used to adjust pre-meal insulin in intensive insulin regimens. However, the precision in CHO quantification required to maintain postprandial glycaemic control is unknown. We determined the effect of a +/-10-g variation in CHO amount, with an individually calculated insulin dose for 60 g CHO, on postprandial glycaemic control.
METHODS: Thirty-one children and adolescents (age range 9.5-16.8 years), 17 using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and 14 using multiple daily injections (MDI), participated. Each subject consumed test lunches of equal macronutrient content, differing only in carbohydrate quantity (50, 60, 70 g CHO), in random order on three consecutive days. For each participant, the insulin dose was the same for each meal, based on their usual insulin : CHO ratio for 60 g CHO. Activity was standardized. Continuous glucose monitoring was used.
RESULTS: The CSII and MDI subjects demonstrated no difference in postprandial blood glucose levels (BGLs) for comparable carbohydrate loads (P > 0.05). The 10-g variations in CHO quantity resulted in no differences in BGLs or area under the glucose curves for 2.5 h (P > 0.05). Hypoglycaemic episodes were not significantly different (P = 0.32). The 70-g meal produced higher glucose excursions after 2.5 h, with a maximum difference of 1.9 mmol/l at 3 h (P = 0.01), but the BGLs remained within international postprandial targets.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients using intensive insulin therapy, an individually calculated insulin dose for 60 g of carbohydrate maintains postprandial BGLs for meals containing between 50 and 70 g of carbohydrate. A single mealtime insulin dose will cover a range in carbohydrate amounts without deterioration in postprandial control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317823     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02669.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  18 in total

1.  A review of the "bolus guide," a new insulin bolus dosing support tool based on selection of carbohydrate ranges.

Authors:  Ewa Pańkowska
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Accurate Carbohydrate Counting Is an Important Determinant of Postprandial Glycemia in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes on Insulin Pump Therapy.

Authors:  Asma Deeb; Ahlam Al Hajeri; Iman Alhmoudi; Nico Nagelkerke
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-21

3.  Computer vision-based carbohydrate estimation for type 1 patients with diabetes using smartphones.

Authors:  Marios Anthimopoulos; Joachim Dehais; Sergey Shevchik; Botwey H Ransford; David Duke; Peter Diem; Stavroula Mougiakakou
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-16

4.  Bolus guide: a novel insulin bolus dosing decision support tool based on selection of carbohydrate ranges.

Authors:  Gali Shapira; Ofer Yodfat; Arava HaCohen; Paul Feigin; Richard Rubin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

5.  "Counting Carbs to Be in Charge": A Comparison of an Internet-Based Education Module With In-Class Education in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Vanita Pais; Barkha P Patel; Sholeh Ghayoori; Jill K Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-01

6.  Improving the estimation of mealtime insulin dose in adults with type 1 diabetes: the Normal Insulin Demand for Dose Adjustment (NIDDA) study.

Authors:  Jiansong Bao; Heather R Gilbertson; Robyn Gray; Diane Munns; Gabrielle Howard; Peter Petocz; Stephen Colagiuri; Jennie C Brand-Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Both dietary protein and fat increase postprandial glucose excursions in children with type 1 diabetes, and the effect is additive.

Authors:  Carmel E M Smart; Megan Evans; Susan M O'Connell; Patrick McElduff; Prudence E Lopez; Timothy W Jones; Elizabeth A Davis; Bruce R King
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Carbohydrate Estimation by a Mobile Phone-Based System Versus Self-Estimations of Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Daniel Rhyner; Hannah Loher; Joachim Dehais; Marios Anthimopoulos; Sergey Shevchik; Ransford Henry Botwey; David Duke; Christoph Stettler; Peter Diem; Stavroula Mougiakakou
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Emphasis on carbohydrates may negatively influence dietary patterns in youth with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Sanjeev N Mehta; Denise L Haynie; Laurie A Higgins; Natalie N Bucey; Alisha J Rovner; Lisa K Volkening; Tonja R Nansel; Lori M B Laffel
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  The factors affecting on estimation of carbohydrate content of meals in carbohydrate counting.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kawamura; Chihiro Takamura; Masakazu Hirose; Tomomi Hashimoto; Takashi Higashide; Yoneo Kashihara; Kayako Hashimura; Haruo Shintaku
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2015-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.