Literature DB >> 19317772

Role and feasibility of psychomotor and dexterity testing in selection for surgical training.

Anthony G Gallagher1, Gerald Leonard, Oscar J Traynor.   

Abstract

The practice of Surgery has undergone major changes in the past 20 years and this is likely to continue. Knowledge, judgement and good technical skills will no longer be enough to safely practice surgery and interventional procedures. Fundamental abilities (e.g. psychomotor skills, visuospatial ability and depth perception) are critically important for catheter-based interventions, NOTES, robotic surgery and other procedural interventions of the future. Not all individuals possess the same amount of these innate fundamental abilities and those less endowed are likely to struggle during surgical training and thereafter in surgical practice. In contrast to other high-skill professions/industries (e.g. aviation) we do not have a tradition of testing prospective surgical trainees for abilities/attributes that we now recognize as being important for surgical practice. Instead, we continue to rely on surrogate markers of future potential (e.g. academic record). However, many studies have shown that psychomotor ability is an important predictor of both learning rate and performance for complex laparoscopic tasks. Psychomotor skills, visuospatial ability and depth perception can all be tested objectively by validated tests. At the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, all short-listed candidates for Higher Surgical Training now undergo formal testing of both technical skills and fundamental abilities (psychomotor skills, visuospatial ability and depth perception). Reports on each candidate's performance are supplied to the interview committee. Furthermore, a prospective database is being kept for correlation with future surgical performance. We believe that selection into surgical training should take account of attributes that we know are important for safe and efficient surgical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317772     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04824.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  11 in total

1.  Coping with stress in surgery: the difficulty of measuring non-technical skills.

Authors:  E Boyle; A M Kennedy; E Doherty; D O'Keeffe; O Traynor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Brenda S Houmard; Sidharth Oberoi; Anton Manyak; Seine Chiang; Sara Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Practice does not always make perfect: need for selection curricula in modern surgical training.

Authors:  Marisa Louridas; Peter Szasz; Andras B Fecso; Michael G Zywiel; Parisa Lak; Ayse B Bener; Kenneth A Harris; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Distribution of innate ability for surgery amongst medical students assessed by an advanced virtual reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Luca Morelli; Franca Melfi; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Urology training in the developing world: The trainers' perspective.

Authors:  M Hammad Ather; Tahmeena Siddiqui
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-08-12

7.  Biomechanical profiles of tracheal intubation: a mannequin-based study to make an objective assessment of clinical skills by expert anesthesiologists and novice residents.

Authors:  Yousuke Sakakura; Masataka Kamei; Ryota Sakamoto; Hideyuki Morii; Asami Itoh-Masui; Eiji Kawamoto; Hiroshi Imai; Masayuki Miyabe; Motomu Shimaoka
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 8.  Recent evidence on visual-spatial ability in surgical education: A scoping review.

Authors:  Portia Kalun; Krista Dunn; Natalie Wagner; Thejodhar Pulakunta; Ranil Sonnadara
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-12-07

9.  Endourological simulator performance in female but not male medical students predicts written examination results in basic surgery.

Authors:  Marcus Schlickum; Li Felländer-Tsai; Leif Hedman; Lars Henningsohn
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 1.612

10.  Selection criteria of residents for residency programs in Kuwait.

Authors:  Yousef Marwan; Adel Ayed
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.