Literature DB >> 19317653

Predictive value of CA 125 and CA 72-4 in ovarian borderline tumors.

Miriam S Lenhard1, Stefanie Nehring, Dorothea Nagel, Doris Mayr, Angela Kirschenhofer, Linda Hertlein, Klaus Friese, Petra Stieber, Alexander Burges.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of cancer antigen (CA) 125 and CA 72-4 in patients with ovarian borderline tumor (BOT).
METHODS: All women diagnosed and treated for BOT at our institution between 1981 and 2008 were included into this retrospective study (n=101). Preoperatively collected serum samples were analyzed for CA 125 (Architect, Abbott and Elecsys, Roche) and CA 72-4 (Elecsys, Roche) with reference to clinical data and compared to healthy women (n=109) and ovarian cancer patients (n=130).
RESULTS: With a median of 34.7 U/mL (range 18.1-385.0 U/mL) for CA 125 and 2.3 U/mL (range 0.2-277.0 U/mL) for CA 72-4, serum tumor markers in BOT patients were significantly elevated as compared to healthy women with a median CA 125 of 13.5 U/mL (range 4.0-49.7 U/mL) and median CA 72-4 of 0.8 U/mL (range 0.2-20.6 U/mL). In addition, there was a significant difference compared with ovarian cancer patients who showed a median CA 125 of 401.5 U/mL (range 12.5-35,813 U/mL), but no difference was observed for CA 72-4 (median 3.9 U/mL, range 0.3-10,068 U/mL). Patients with a pT1a tumor stage had significantly lower values of CA 125 but not of CA 72-4 compared with individuals with higher tumor stages (median CA 125 29.9 U/mL for pT1a vs. 50.9 U/mL for >pT1a; p=0.014). There was a trend for increased concentrations of CA 125 but not of CA 72-4 in the presence of ascites, endometriosis or peritoneal implants at primary diagnosis. With respect to the prognostic value of CA 125 or CA 72-4, CA 125 was significantly higher at primary diagnosis in patients who later developed recurrence (251.0 U/mL vs. 34.65 U/mL, p=0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum CA 125 and CA 72-4 concentrations in BOT patients differ from healthy controls and patients with ovarian cancer. CA 125, but not CA 72-4, at primary diagnosis correlates with tumor stage and tends to be increased in the presence of ascites, endometriosis or peritoneal implants. Moreover, CA 125 at primary diagnosis appears to have prognostic value for recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317653     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  Role of HE4, CA72.4, and CA125 in monitoring ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Granato; Cecilia Midulla; Flavia Longo; Barbara Colaprisca; Luigi Frati; Emanuela Anastasi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-04-13

2.  NFAT Overexpression Correlates with CA72-4 and Poor Prognosis of Ovarian Clear-Cell Carcinoma Subtype.

Authors:  Bing Xin; Kai-Qiang Ji; Yi-Si Liu; Xiao-Dong Zhao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Evaluation of Preoperative Serum Levels of CA 125 and Expression of p53 in Ovarian Neoplasms: A Prospective Clinicopathological Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Ranjan Kumar Tiwari; Kaushik Saha; Debasis Mukhopadhyay; Chhanda Datta; Uttara Chatterjee; Tarun Kumar Ghosh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-07

4.  Elevated serum CA72-4 levels predict poor prognosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma after intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Yuan Zhu; Luying Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 5.  Fertility sparing treatment in borderline ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Rosa Maria Alvarez; Daniel Vazquez-Vicente
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-02-03

6.  Evaluation of Serum CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, CA125 and Ferritin as Diagnostic Markers and Factors of Clinical Parameters for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yanfeng Gao; Jinping Wang; Yue Zhou; Sen Sheng; Steven Y Qian; Xiongwei Huo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Incomplete staging surgery as a major predictor of relapse of borderline ovarian tumor.

Authors:  Margarita Romeo; Francesc Pons; Pilar Barretina; Joaquim Radua
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Is CA72-4 a useful biomarker in differential diagnosis between ovarian endometrioma and epithelial ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Lucia Manganaro; Teresa Granato; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Luigi Frati; Maria Grazia Porpora
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.434

9.  The use of HE4, CA125 and CA72-4 biomarkers for differential diagnosis between ovarian endometrioma and epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Teresa Granato; Renato Falzarano; Paola Storelli; Adele Ticino; Luigi Frati; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Maria Grazia Porpora
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 10.  The Complementary Role of Imaging and Tumor Biomarkerszzm321990in Gynecological Cancers: An Update of the Literature

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Silvia Gigli; Laura Ballesio; Antonio Angeloni; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.