Literature DB >> 19317607

Effectiveness and safety of etanercept in subjects with RA who have failed infliximab therapy: 16-week, open-label, observational study.

Clifton O Bingham1, Akgun Ince, Boulos Haraoui, Edward C Keystone, Yun Chon, Scott Baumgartner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, including etanercept (a soluble TNF receptor) and infliximab (an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody) are used in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 50 mg etanercept weekly in subjects with RA who have failed infliximab therapy.
METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 16-week observational study enrolled subjects who had experienced primary (failure to achieve an initial response) or secondary (failure to maintain an initial response) infliximab failures. Effectiveness was measured using European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria and laboratory assessments were used to evaluate levels of inflammation, lymphotoxin alpha, drug concentrations, and antibodies to infliximab. Safety endpoints included incidence of serious adverse events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered under U.S. National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00099554.
RESULTS: At week 16, over half (62%; 95% CI = 55, 69) of all subjects in the trial achieved a good or moderate EULAR response (DAS28) with etanercept. Using ACR criteria, after 16 weeks of etanercept therapy, 45% (95% CI = 38, 52) of all subjects had achieved an ACR20 response. Benefits were noted in tender and swollen joint counts, subject and physician global assessments, joint pain, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Outcomes were similar between subjects with primary and secondary infliximab failures. Levels of lymphotoxin alpha did not appear to affect response to etanercept. Potential limitations included the lack of a washout period, short duration of the trial, and the number of subjects who did not receive all doses of etanercept.
CONCLUSION: In this open-label, uncontrolled study, subjects with moderate to severe RA who failed to respond or who lost their initial response to infliximab safely benefited from receiving etanercept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317607     DOI: 10.1185/03007990902841010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  11 in total

1.  Content and Construct Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Questionnaire: OMERACT 2016 Workshop Report.

Authors:  Susan J Bartlett; Skye P Barbic; Vivian P Bykerk; Ernest H Choy; Rieke Alten; Robin Christensen; Alfons den Broeder; Bruno Fautrel; Daniel E Furst; Francis Guillemin; Sarah Hewlett; Amye L Leong; Anne Lyddiatt; Lyn March; Pamela Montie; Christoph Pohl; Marieke Scholte Voshaar; Thasia G Woodworth; Clifton O Bingham
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 2.  Adverse reactions to biologic agents and their medical management.

Authors:  Onur Boyman; Denis Comte; François Spertini
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  The role of lymphotoxin-α in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Tomohiro Hirose; Yuri Fukuma; Ayumu Takeshita; Keiichiro Nishida
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 4.  The effectiveness of anti-TNF-alpha therapies when used sequentially in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suzanne Lloyd; Sylwia Bujkiewicz; Allan J Wailoo; Alex J Sutton; David Scott
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Evaluating the efficacy of sequential biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.

Authors:  Regina Rendas-Baum; Gene V Wallenstein; Tamas Koncz; Mark Kosinski; Min Yang; John Bradley; Samuel H Zwillich
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Safety and effectiveness responses to etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: a sub-analysis of a post-marketing surveillance study focusing on the duration of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Takao Koike; Masayoshi Harigai; Shigeko Inokuma; Naoki Ishiguro; Junnosuke Ryu; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Yoshiya Tanaka; Hisashi Yamanaka; Koichi Fujii; Takunari Yoshinaga; Bruce Freundlich; Michio Suzukawa
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Cycling of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors versus switching to different mechanism of action therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Migliore; Giuseppe Pompilio; Davide Integlia; Joe Zhuo; Evo Alemao
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.346

8.  Two dosing regimens of certolizumab pegol in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D E Furst; S A Shaikh; M Greenwald; B Bennett; O Davies; K Luijtens; F Staelens; W Koetse; P Bertin
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Use of Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis to estimate the HAQ for mapping onto the EQ-5D questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sylwia Bujkiewicz; John R Thompson; Alex J Sutton; Nicola J Cooper; Mark J Harrison; Deborah P M Symmons; Keith R Abrams
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Single-Arm Study of Etanercept in Adult Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Failed Adalimumab Treatment.

Authors:  Louis Bessette; Majed Khraishi; Alan J Kivitz; Arunan Kaliyaperumal; Rama Grantab; Melanie Poulin-Costello; Maya Isaila; David Collier
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2017-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.