Literature DB >> 19309696

In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).

Johan C H Schuurbiers1, Nieves Gonzalo Lopez, Jurgen Ligthart, Frank J H Gijsen, Jouke Dijkstra, Patrick W Serruys, Antonius F Van der Steen, Jolanda J Wentzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The CAAS QCA-3D system (Pie Medical Imaging BV, the Netherlands) was validated against 3D reconstructions based on fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS), allowing slice by slice validation of the lumen areas and 3D geometric values.
BACKGROUND: Accurate online 3D reconstruction of human coronary arteries is of outmost importance during clinical practice in the catheterization laboratory. The CAAS QCA-3D system provides technology to 3D reconstruct human coronary arteries based on two or more angiographic images, but was not validated in realistic arteries before.
METHODS: Ten patients were imaged using biplane angiography and an ECG gated (TomTec) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) pullback (stepsize 0.5 mm, Boston Scientific). The coronary arteries were 3D reconstructed based on (a) fusion of biplane angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and (b) CAAS QCA-3D using the biplane angiography images. For both systems the length, the curvature and the lumen areas at 0.5 mm spacing were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the CAAS QCA-3D system underestimated the lumen areas systematically by 0.45 +/- 1.49 mm2. The segment length was slightly underestimated by the CAAS QCA-3D system (62.1 +/- 11.3 vs. 63.2 +/- 11.4 mm; P < 0.05), while the curvature of the analyzed segments were not statistically different.
CONCLUSIONS: The CAAS QCA-3D system allows 3D reconstruction of human coronary arteries based on biplane angiography. Validation against the ANGUS system showed that both the 3D geometry and lumen areas are highly correlated which makes the CAAS QCA-3D system a promising tool for applications in the catheterization laboratory and opens possibilities for computational fluid dynamics. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19309696     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  13 in total

Review 1.  Novel QCA methodologies and angiographic scores.

Authors:  Vivian G Ng; Alexandra J Lansky
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  A pragmatic approach to understand peripheral artery lumen surface stiffness due to plaque heterogeneity.

Authors:  Erica E Neumann; Melissa Young; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  Coronary artery distensibility assessed by 3.0 Tesla coronary magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with and without coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Kelle; Allison G Hays; Glenn A Hirsch; Gary Gerstenblith; Julie M Miller; Angela M Steinberg; Michael Schär; John H Texter; Ernst Wellnhofer; Robert G Weiss; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Comparison of angiographic and IVUS derived coronary geometric reconstructions for evaluation of the association of hemodynamics with coronary artery disease progression.

Authors:  Lucas H Timmins; Jin Suo; Parham Eshtehardi; David S Molony; Michael C McDaniel; John N Oshinski; Don P Giddens; Habib Samady
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Hemodynamics in Plaque Erosion.

Authors:  Ian C Campbell; Lucas H Timmins; Don P Giddens; Renu Virmani; Alessandro Veneziani; S Tanveer Rab; Habib Samady; Michael C McDaniel; Aloke V Finn; W Robert Taylor; John N Oshinski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.495

6.  In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Liang Xu; Jurgen Ligthart; Bo Xu; Karen Witberg; Zhongwei Sun; Gerhard Koning; Johan H C Reiber; Evelyn Regar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Niels R Holm; Gerhard Koning; Zheng Huang; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography can detect reliably ischemic coronary lesions based on fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Woo-Young Chung; Byoung-Joo Choi; Seong-Hoon Lim; Yoshiki Matsuo; Ryan J Lennon; Rajiv Gulati; Gurpreet S Sandhu; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Fusion of fibrous cap thickness and wall shear stress to assess plaque vulnerability in coronary arteries: a pilot study.

Authors:  Guillaume Zahnd; Jelle Schrauwen; Antonios Karanasos; Evelyn Regar; Wiro Niessen; Theo van Walsum; Frank Gijsen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Comparison of two dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (2D-QCA) with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the assessment of coronary artery lesion dimensions.

Authors:  J Mazhar; E Shaw; U K Allahwala; G A Figtree; R Bhindi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.