Literature DB >> 19309643

Refinement of technique in injection lipolysis based on scientific studies and clinical evaluation.

Diane Duncan1, J Peter Rubin, Loren Golitz, Stephen Badylak, Lynne Kesel, John Freund, Danielle Duncan.   

Abstract

The unusual evolution of the practice of injection lipolysis has generated doubt regarding its safety and efficacy among many physicians. During the early years of this decade, mesotherapy was practiced by a few physicians, but the practice was not widespread. Paramedical practitioners and business developers saw the market potential for nonsurgical fat reduction, and the practice of injection lipolysis was packaged and sold before the mechanism of action was understood. Because of the early lack of scientific research and understanding of the limitations of injection lipolysis, many unsuitable patients were treated with this modality. To better understand the way injection lipolysis works, the inclusion and exclusion criteria for patients desiring treatment, and an accurate clinical evaluation format for potential treatment regions, a series of scientific studies was performed in 2007 and early 2008. These studies included a serial histopathology evaluation of treated patients over time, a stem cell study performed with the McGowan Research Institute in Pittsburgh, an animal study performed in conjunction with the Colorado State University veterinary school, and a prospective multicenter clinical trial using injection lipolysis in the back roll region. The purpose of these studies was to determine the way injection lipolysis works, how modifications of the formula and technique change the outcome, the role of each constituent component of various formulas, and the degree of fat reduction and skin retraction that is attainable with these treatments. The influence of depth of injection, distance between injection points, volume of injection, and ratios of constituent components was studied. The degree of topographic contour correction and the amount of volume reduction were evaluated. Following a review of these recent studies, an updated recommendation for the clinical practice of injection lipolysis was formulated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19309643     DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2008.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Plast Surg        ISSN: 0094-1298            Impact factor:   2.017


  11 in total

1.  [Injection lipolysis].

Authors:  K Hoffmann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  Injection Adipolysis: Mechanisms, Agents, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Shahraam Kamalpour; Keith Leblanc
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Improvement in Jowl Fat Following ATX-101 Treatment: Results From a Single-Site Study.

Authors:  Sachin M Shridharani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Variability in associations of phosphatidylcholine molecular species with metabolic syndrome in Mexican-American families.

Authors:  Hemant Kulkarni; Peter J Meikle; Manju Mamtani; Jacquelyn M Weir; Christopher K Barlow; Jeremy B Jowett; Claire Bellis; Thomas D Dyer; Matthew P Johnson; David L Rainwater; Laura Almasy; Michael C Mahaney; Anthony G Comuzzie; John Blangero; Joanne E Curran
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 1.880

5.  Facial sculpting: Comprehensive approach for aesthetic correction of round face.

Authors:  M K Thomas; J A D'Silva; A J Borole
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01

6.  Results from a pooled analysis of two European, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of ATX-101 for the pharmacologic reduction of excess submental fat.

Authors:  James McDiarmid; Jesus Benito Ruiz; Daniel Lee; Susanne Lippert; Claudia Hartisch; Blanka Havlickova
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  A prospective study analyzing the application of radiofrequency energy and high-voltage, ultrashort pulse duration electrical fields on the quantitative reduction of adipose tissue.

Authors:  Diane Irvine Duncan; Theresa H M Kim; Robbin Temaat
Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.247

8.  Novel Surface Anatomic Landmarks of the Jowl to Guide Treatment with ATX-101.

Authors:  Sachin M Shridharani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-10

9.  Commentary on: Metabolic and structural effects of phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate injections on subcutaneous fat: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Diane Duncan
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Improvement in Jowl Fat following ATX-101 Treatment: Results from a Single-Site Study.

Authors:  Sachin M Shridharani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.