Literature DB >> 19309604

[Prosthetic infection after hernioplasty. Five years experience].

Jose Bueno Lledó1, Yurena Sosa Quesada, Inmaculada Gomez I Gavara, Javier Vaqué Urbaneja, Fernando Carbonell Tatay, Santiago Bonafé Diana, Providencia García Pastor, Ricardo Baquero Valdelomar, José Mir Pallardó.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prosthesis infection is an infrequent but important complication in abdominal wall surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the infection of the prosthesis after hernia repair, as well as the treatment to apply. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Between January 2002 and December 2006, we performed 1055 prosthetic hernia repairs: 761 inguinal hernias (72.1%), 74 umbilical hernias (7%) and 220 ventral hernias (20.9%). We prospectively analysed preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables, as well as the incidence of infection of surgical wound and of prosthesis. We used ASA classification for preoperative anaesthetic evaluation.
RESULTS: The overall percentage of infection of the prosthesis was 1.3%. Infection was observed in 11 repairs with polypropylene mesh (PPL), in 4 with PTFE mesh, and one case in combined mesh. Risk factors of mesh infection were: obesity (p=0.002), diabetes (p=0.020), the type of repair (p=0.047), emergency surgery (p=0.001), the type and size of mesh (p=0.003; p=0.007) and time of surgery >180 min (p<0.001). Seven of the 11 patients with infection of PPL prosthesis were resolved with conservative treatment, whereas all the cases with PTFE infection or mixed mesh needed removal to solve the problem.
CONCLUSIONS: Several factors are involved in producing a prosthesis infection. Whereas antibiotic treatment and surgical drainage of the infection can be sufficient in most PPL mesh infection, PTFE prostheses need to be removed prematurely in order to halt the infection process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19309604     DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2008.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp        ISSN: 0009-739X            Impact factor:   1.653


  8 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Michael N Mavros; Stavros Athanasiou; Vangelis G Alexiou; Pantelis K Mitsikostas; George Peppas; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  [Management of mesh-related infections].

Authors:  U A Dietz; L Spor; C-T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Ambulatory hernia surgery under local anesthesia is feasible and safe in obese patients.

Authors:  A Acevedo; J León
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Critical analysis of Strattice performance in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: intermediate-risk patients and early complications.

Authors:  Ketan M Patel; Frank P Albino; Maurice Y Nahabedian; Parag Bhanot
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

5.  Inguinal hernia repair in overweight and obese patients.

Authors:  Chan Yong Park; Jung Chul Kim; Dong Yi Kim; Shin Kon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-09-26

6.  Effectiveness of mesh hernioplasty in incarcerated inguinal hernias.

Authors:  Georges Kamtoh; Radoslaw Pach; Wojciech Kibil; Andrzej Matyja; Rafal Solecki; Bartlomiej Banas; Jan Kulig
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  Value of CT sinography and analysis of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis for abdominal wall sinus.

Authors:  Xuechao Du; Yuchang Yan; Pengtao Sun; Shuo Yang; Zhenyu Pan; Sujun Liu; Tao Jiang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.847

8.  In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection.

Authors:  Xinsen Xu; Ming Zhan; Xinxing Li; Tao Chen; Linhua Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.