BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, some ligands targeting the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 (S1P(3)) have become available. The characterization of these compounds was mainly based on one functional read-out system, although S1P(3) receptors are known to activate different signal transduction pathways. Therefore, this study pharmacologically characterizes these compounds using different assays. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using CHO-FlpIn cells expressing the human S1P(3) receptor the potencies and maximal effects of S1P, FTY720-P, VPC23019, VPC23153 and VPC24191 were determined in three different assays [inhibition of cAMP accumulation, elevation of intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca(2+)](i)) and S1P(3) receptor internalization]. KEY RESULTS: All compounds tested inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation, increased [Ca(2+)](i) and induced S1P(3) receptor internalization but with different potencies and maximal effects. S1P was the most potent compound in all assays followed by FTY720-P. The VPC compounds were generally less potent than S1P and FTY720-P. Regarding the maximal effects, all compounds except VPC23153, behaved as full agonists in the cAMP accumulation assay. In the calcium assay, FTY720-P, VPC23019 and VPC24191 displayed partial and VPC23153 weak partial agonist activity, relative to S1P. Interestingly, treatment with the G(i) inactivator Pertussis toxin, did not affect S1P-induced [Ca(2+)](i) elevations but inhibited those in response to the other compounds, by about 50%. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrated differential response patterns at the S1P(3) receptor for a range of ligands. These differences could indicate the presence of functional selectivity at this receptor as FTY720-P and the VPC compounds seemed to signal predominantly via G(i)- whereas S1P activated G(i) and G(q)-coupled pathways.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, some ligands targeting the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 (S1P(3)) have become available. The characterization of these compounds was mainly based on one functional read-out system, although S1P(3) receptors are known to activate different signal transduction pathways. Therefore, this study pharmacologically characterizes these compounds using different assays. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using CHO-FlpIn cells expressing the human S1P(3) receptor the potencies and maximal effects of S1P, FTY720-P, VPC23019, VPC23153 and VPC24191 were determined in three different assays [inhibition of cAMP accumulation, elevation of intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca(2+)](i)) and S1P(3) receptor internalization]. KEY RESULTS: All compounds tested inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation, increased [Ca(2+)](i) and induced S1P(3) receptor internalization but with different potencies and maximal effects. S1P was the most potent compound in all assays followed by FTY720-P. The VPC compounds were generally less potent than S1P and FTY720-P. Regarding the maximal effects, all compounds except VPC23153, behaved as full agonists in the cAMP accumulation assay. In the calcium assay, FTY720-P, VPC23019 and VPC24191 displayed partial and VPC23153 weak partial agonist activity, relative to S1P. Interestingly, treatment with the G(i) inactivator Pertussis toxin, did not affect S1P-induced [Ca(2+)](i) elevations but inhibited those in response to the other compounds, by about 50%. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrated differential response patterns at the S1P(3) receptor for a range of ligands. These differences could indicate the presence of functional selectivity at this receptor as FTY720-P and the VPC compounds seemed to signal predominantly via G(i)- whereas S1P activated G(i) and G(q)-coupled pathways.
Authors: J Kon; K Sato; T Watanabe; H Tomura; A Kuwabara; T Kimura; K Tamama; T Ishizuka; N Murata; T Kanda; I Kobayashi; H Ohta; M Ui; F Okajima Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-08-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: M Forrest; S-Y Sun; R Hajdu; J Bergstrom; D Card; G Doherty; J Hale; C Keohane; C Meyers; J Milligan; S Mills; N Nomura; H Rosen; M Rosenbach; G-J Shei; I I Singer; M Tian; S West; V White; J Xie; R L Proia; S Mandala Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2004-01-27 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Sven-Christian Sensken; Claudia Stäubert; Petra Keul; Bodo Levkau; Torsten Schöneberg; Markus H Gräler Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: U Hofmann; K Hu; F Walter; N Burkard; G Ertl; J Bauersachs; O Ritter; S Frantz; A Bonz Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Ryan M Fryer; Akalushi Muthukumarana; Paul C Harrison; Suzanne Nodop Mazurek; Rong Rhonda Chen; Kyle E Harrington; Roger M Dinallo; Joshua C Horan; Lori Patnaude; Louise K Modis; Glenn A Reinhart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 3.240