Literature DB >> 19308820

Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine?

S A Lavender1, Y C Li, R N Natarajan, G B J Andersson.   

Abstract

The aim of this research was to evaluate whether the asymmetry multiplier incorporated in the 1991 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health lifting equation adequately controls the biomechanical spine loads during asymmetric lifting. Sixteen male subjects lifted a box from four initial locations varying in terms of the angular deviation from the mid-sagittal plane (0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees). From each location, boxes that weighed the recommended weight limit (RWL) and three times the RWL were lifted at two qualitatively defined lifting speeds. Ground reaction forces were combined with kinematic data in a linked-segment model to quantify the 3-D moments at the base of the spine (L5/S1) and the spine compression forces. The results show that the twisting and lateral bending moments increased with task asymmetry despite the lessening of the RWL (p<0.01). The flexion moment and the spine compression decreased with asymmetry, although at a slower rate than the RWL. When the dynamics were removed from the linked segment spine model to approximate the assumption of slow and smooth lifting, the estimated compression remained approximately 3400 N across all asymmetry conditions. Thus, the reduction in the RWL due to asymmetry multiplier appears appropriate and should not be changed, as been suggested by recent psychophysical studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19308820     DOI: 10.1080/00140130802480802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Vern Putz-Anderson; Arun Garg; Kermit G Davis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Automation of workplace lifting hazard assessment for musculoskeletal injury prevention.

Authors:  June T Spector; Max Lieblich; Stephen Bao; Kevin McQuade; Margaret Hughes
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-06-24

3.  Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".

Authors:  Alberto Ranavolo; Tiwana Varrecchia; Martina Rinaldi; Alessio Silvetti; Mariano Serrao; Silvia Conforto; Francesco Draicchio
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.179

4.  Extended compilation of autopsy-material measurements on lumbar ultimate compressive strength for deriving reference values in ergonomic work design: The Revised Dortmund Recommendations.

Authors:  Matthias Jäger
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.068

5.  Centre of pressure parameters for the assessment of biomechanical risk in fatiguing frequency-dependent lifting activities.

Authors:  Carmen D'Anna; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alberto Ranavolo; Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Deborah Falla; Francesco Draicchio; Silvia Conforto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.