Literature DB >> 19308536

Lower-limb growth: how predictable are predictions?

Paula M Kelly1, Alain Diméglio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to clarify the different methods of predictions for growth of the lower limb and to propose a simplified method to calculate the final limb deficit and the correct timing of epiphysiodesis.
BACKGROUND: Lower-limb growth is characterized by four different periods: antenatal growth (exponential); birth to 5 years (rapid growth); 5 years to puberty (stable growth); and puberty, which is the final growth spurt characterized by a rapid acceleration phase lasting 1 year followed by a more gradual deceleration phase lasting 1.5 years. The younger the child, the less precise is the prediction. Repeating measurements can increase the accuracy of predictions and those calculated at the beginning of puberty are the most accurate. The challenge is to reduce the margin of uncertainty. Confrontation of the different parameters-bone age, Tanner signs, annual growth velocity of the standing height, sub-ischial length and sitting height-is the most accurate method. Charts and diagrams are only models and templates. There are many mathematical equations in the literature; we must be able to step back from these rigid calculations because they are a false guarantee. The dynamic of growth needs a flexible approach. There are, however, some rules of thumb that may be helpful for different clinical scenarios. CALCULATION OF LIMB LENGTH DISCREPANCY: For congenital malformations, at birth the limb length discrepancy must be multiplied by 5 to give the final limb length discrepancy. Multiple by 3 at 1 year of age; by 2 at 3 years in girls and 4 years in boys; by 1.5 at 7 years in girls and boys, by 1.2 at 9 years in girls and 11 years in boys and by 1.1 at the onset of puberty (11 years bone age for girls and 13 years bone age for boys). TIMING OF EPIPHYSIODESIS: For the timing of epiphysiodesis, several simple principles must be observed to reduce the margin of error; strict and repeated measurements, rigorous analysis of the data obtained, perfect evaluation of bone age with elbow plus hand radiographs and confirmation with Tanner signs. The decision should always be taken at the beginning of puberty. A simple rule is that, at the beginning of puberty, there is an average of 5 cm growth remaining at the knee. There are four common different scenarios: (1) A 5-cm discrepancy-epiphysiodesis of both femur and tibia at the beginning of puberty (11 years bone age girls and 13 years in boys). (2) A 4-cm discrepancy-epiphysiodesis of femur and tibia 6 months after the onset of puberty (11 years 6 months bone age girls, 13 years 6 months bone age boys, tri-radiate cartilage open). (3) A 3-cm discrepancy-epiphysiodesis of femur only at the start of puberty, (skeletal age of 11 years in girls and 13 years in boys). (4) A 2-cm discrepancy-epiphysiodesis of femur only, 1 year after the start of puberty (12 years bone age girls and 14 years in boys).

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19308536      PMCID: PMC2656868          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-008-0119-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  20 in total

1.  Multiplier method for predicting limb-length discrepancy.

Authors:  D Paley; A Bhave; J E Herzenberg; J R Bowen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Growth in pediatric orthopaedics.

Authors:  A Dimeglio
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Growth and predictions of growth in the lower extremities.

Authors:  M ANDERSON; W T GREEN; M B MESSNER
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Tables for predicting adult height from skeletal age: revised for use with the Greulich-Pyle hand standards.

Authors:  N BAYLEY; S R PINNEAU
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1952-04       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length.

Authors:  L S Chitty; D G Altman; A Henderson; S Campbell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-02

6.  Developmental patterns in lower-extremity length discrepancies.

Authors:  F Shapiro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  R J Snijders; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  [Skeletal age determination from the elbow during pubertal growth].

Authors:  Y P Charles; F Canavese; A Diméglio
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [Epiphysiodesis in the treatment of discrepancies in length of the lower extremities (author's transl)].

Authors:  G Filipe; M Bercovy; H Carlioz
Journal:  Chir Pediatr       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug

10.  Equalization of lower limbs by epiphysiodesis: results of treatment.

Authors:  S Porat; A Peyser; G C Robin
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  24 in total

1.  Constant inhibition in congenital lower extremity shortening: does it begin in utero?

Authors:  Andy Tsai; Tal Laor; Judy A Estroff; James R Kasser
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-24

2.  [Special topics in pediatric orthopedics: options and limits of growth guidance].

Authors:  B Vogt; M Horter; R Rödl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Can orthopaedic clinicians learn to read skeletal bone age? An inter- and intra observer study between specialties.

Authors:  R A Rajan; M G Swindells; J E Metcalfe; C Konstantoulakis
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Possible mistakes in prediction of bone maturation in fibular hemimelia by Moseley chart.

Authors:  György Szoke; William G Mackenzie; Gyula Domos; Sándor Berki; Sándor Kiss; J Richard Bowen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The effects of uninvolved side epiphysiodesis for limb length equalization in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: clinical evaluation with the Edinburgh visual gait score.

Authors:  Marco Corradin; Roberto Schiavon; Andrea Borgo; Jacques Deslandes; Antonella Cersosimo; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-06

6.  Assessment of rapidly advancing bone age during puberty on elbow radiographs using a deep neural network model.

Authors:  Kyung-Sik Ahn; Byeonguk Bae; Woo Young Jang; Jin Hyuck Lee; Saelin Oh; Baek Hyun Kim; Si Wook Lee; Hae Woon Jung; Jae Won Lee; Jinkyeong Sung; Kyu-Hwan Jung; Chang Ho Kang; Soon Hyuck Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Effect of limb lengthening on internodal length and conduction velocity of peripheral nerve.

Authors:  A Hamish Simpson; Thomas H Gillingwater; Heather Anderson; David Cottrell; Diane L Sherman; Richard R Ribchester; Peter J Brophy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  [Guided growth in children and adolescents. Correction of leg length discrepancies and leg axis deformities].

Authors:  B Vogt; F Schiedel; R Rödl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  The Actions of IGF-1 in the Growth Plate and Its Role in Postnatal Bone Elongation.

Authors:  Holly L Racine; Maria A Serrat
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Return to Sport After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft ACL Reconstruction in High School-Aged Athletes.

Authors:  Ryan C Rauck; John M Apostolakos; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Brandon L Schneider; Riley J Williams; Joshua S Dines; David W Altchek; Andrew Pearle; Answorth Allen; Beth Shubin Stein; David Dines; Anil Ranawat; Anne Kelly; Bryan Kelly; Howard Rose; Michael Maynard; Sabrina Strickland; Struan Coleman; Jo Hannafin; John MacGillivray; Robert Marx; Russell Warren; Scott Rodeo; Stephen Fealy; Stephen O'Brien; Thomas Wickiewicz
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.