Literature DB >> 19308381

The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation.

David K Yousefzadeh1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this communication is to highlight the shortcomings of all currently used imaging criteria in diagnosing or excluding malrotation and offer ultrasound demonstration of the 3(rd) portion of the duodenum (D3) between the AO and the SMA in transverse and sagittal plains as the most reliable diagnostic method.
BACKGROUND: Although UGI is currently considered to be the imaging modality of choice in diagnosis of malrotations, numerous publications indicate that in certain patients, false positives and negatives can be encountered.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material consists of more than 10 years experience in university settings, during which the author has used US as the definitive imaging modality for the work-up of malrotation. High resolution linear transducers (5-17 MHz) are the transducers of choice. Imaging plains: A. Transverse. With gradual grading compression, the following landmarks are illustrated in cehaplocaudad directions in the following order. The junction of splenic vein with the SMV portal vein. The cross sections of SMA and SMV that may either be situated in midline, or to the right or the left of the midline. Left renal vein crossing the spine from left to right between the AO and the SMA. The jejunal vein, often coming from left, transversing between the AO and the SMA. The transverse portion of the duodenum, D3, between the AO & the SMA. B. Sagittal. D3 between vertically oriented SMA-SMV and the AO. If SMA is not aligned with the AO by slight compression on the right or the left side of the abdomen, it will be aligned (depending on leftward or rightward position of SMA-SMV in axial plain). Vertical orientation of SMA and SMV if they have an anteroposterior orientation. C. Coronal. Side by side orientation of SMA and SMV if they don't have an anteroposterior orientation.
RESULTS: In overwhelming majority of cases, by illustrating a retromesenteric D3 malrotation and, therefore, midgut volvulus were excluded. DISCUSSION: None of the current imaging criteria addresses the following most fundamental anatomic and embryologic facts regarding the gut rotation and fixation. In first trimester, the D3 is secured in retroperitoneal space after the embryologic journey comes to an end, making the duodenum immune of midgut volvulus. The surgical pathology of malrotation-midgut volvulus indicates that D3 is always Intraperitoneal and has not reached its final embryologic destination in retroperitoneal space. Demonstrating a retromesenteric D3, therefore, indicates that the embryologic journey is completed and the patient does not have malrotation. Excluding malrotation excludes the likelihood of midgut volvus.
CONCLUSION: The position of the DJJ, the configuration of the duodenal sweep, the orientation of the mesenteric vessels are all wrong horses to bet on because none of them addresses the fundamental anatomic and embryologic facts. Only the cross-sectional imaging, US, CT and MRI can prove that the D3 is retromesenteric, therefore, excluding malrotation and volvulus. Therefore, demonstrating a retromesenteric duodenum is the reference standard of imaging in the work-up of malrotation, not any other previously published criteria. The US imaging is the most acceptable imaging method for malrotation work-up, in the spirit of ALARA principle and "Image Gently" campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19308381     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-1116-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  34 in total

Review 1.  US assessment of neonatal bowel (necrotizing enterocolitis excluded).

Authors:  Corinne Veyrac; Catherine Baud; Olivier Prodhomme; Magali Saguintaah; Alain Couture
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  Sonographic assessment of the retroperitoneal position of the third portion of the duodenum: an indicator of normal intestinal rotation.

Authors:  Renaud Menten; Raymond Reding; Véronique Godding; Dana Dumitriu; Philippe Clapuyt
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09

3.  US as a primary tool in the work-up of malrotation.

Authors:  Anuradha Chandramohan; Sridhar Gibikote; Akshay K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-08-05

4.  Malrotation of midgut in adults, an unsuspected and neglected condition--An analysis of 64 consensus confirmed cases.

Authors:  G Raghavendra Prasad; J V Subba Rao; Humera Fatima; Hameed Mohd Shareef; Asif Shah; G Satyanarayana
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-13

5.  Ultrasound in the evaluation of necrotic bowel in children: A pictorial essay.

Authors:  Mark Qw Wang; Margaret Yw Lee; Harvey El Teo
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-12-03

6.  Regarding online publication of 'CT appearance of the duodenum and mesenteric vessels in children with normal and abnormal bowel rotation'.

Authors:  David K Yousefzadeh
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-30

7.  Case 1: a newborn with bilious emesis.

Authors:  Arnold C Merrow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-21

8.  Is color Doppler a reliable method for the diagnosis of malrotation?

Authors:  İbrahim Karaman; Ayşe Karaman; Hasibe Gökçe Çınar; Ahmet Ertürk; Derya Erdoğan; İsmet Faruk Özgüner
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  Disorders of midgut rotation: making the correct diagnosis on UGI series in difficult cases.

Authors:  Vivian Tang; Alan Daneman; Oscar M Navarro; J Ted Gerstle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-04-16

Review 10.  Unusual presentation of midgut malrotation with incidental nutcracker syndrome in adulthood: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Panchal N HitenKumar; Dharita Shah; Chiripal B Priyanka
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.